The doctrine of the Image of God by Аrchbishop Feofan (Prokopovich) and Amand Polyansky: The comparative analysis

Authors

  • Priest Arkady Redkin St Tikhon’s Orthodox University, 23B, ul. Novokuznetskaya, Moscow, 115184, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2023.104

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the doctrine of the image of God by Archbishop Feofan (Prokopovich) and the reformed theologian Amand Polyansky. The main engine of church reform, Archbishop Feofan, was repeatedly accused of Protestantism, while others considered his position Orthodox and believed that he used the works of Protestant authors to build his position. The anthropocentrism of the New time has posed new questions to theology that require answers and an appropriate reaction and development of the anthropological provisions of the Christian doctrine. In this era, there is a surge of appeals to the teachings of St Augustine, on which both Protestant and Catholic authors relied. At the same time, the assessment of the Synodal period largely began to be based on the concept of the Western influence of Russian theology. There is no doubt that there was an influence of Western theology on the Russian tradition, but it seems premature and unreasonable to unequivocally negative assessment of this period, which is little studied in the scientific literature. An assessment of this period becomes possible when referring to its origins. Using the example of a narrow section of the anthropology of Archbishop Feofan (Prokopovich), the doctrine of the image of God, it is proposed to compare his theological positions with the provisions of Amand Polyansky, the proximity to which has been repeatedly noted by researchers both modern and prerevolutionary researchers.

Keywords:

anthropology, the image of God, Western influence in Russian theology, Feofan Prokopovich, Augustinism, Amand Polyansky, Saint Augustine

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Amand Polyansky (1610) Syntagma theologiae christianae ab Amando Polano a Polansdorf. In 2 vols, vol. 1. Hanoviae, Typis Wechelianis, apud Claudium Marnium & haeredes Johannis Aubrii.

Cherviakovskii P. (1876) “Introduction to theology of Theophan Prokopovich”, in Khristianskoe chtenie, no. 1–2. pp. 32–86. (In Russian)

Cherviakovskii P. (1878) “On the method of ‘Introduction to theology’ by Feofan Prokopovich”, in Khristianskoe chtenie, no. 3–4, pp. 321–351. (In Russian)

Dmitriev M. V. (2012) “Orthodox confessionalization in Eastern Europe in the second half of the 16th century”, in Drogobits’kii kraeznavchii zbirnik, vol. 16, pp. 133–152. Drogobich, Kolo Publ. (In Russian)

Feofan (Prokopovich), Archbishop (1773) “A special discourse on mortal and pardonable sin”, in Feofana Prokopovicha arkhiepiskopa Velikago Novagoroda i Velikikh Luk chetyre sochineniia, pp. 233–284. Moscow, Universitetskaia tipografiia Publ. (In Russian)

Feofan (Prokopovich), Archbishop (1785) Theological teaching about the state of an intact man, or about what Adam was in paradise. Moscow, Tipografiia Ponomareva Publ. (In Russian)

Feofan (Prokopovich), Archbishop (1792–1793) Christiana Orthodoxe Theologie. In 3 vols, vol. 2. Lipsiae, Breitkopf.

Florovskii G., Archpriest (2006) The ways of Russian theology. Minsk, Kharvest Publ. (In Russian)

Kartashev A. (1913) “On the question of Orthodoxy of Feofan Prokopovich”, in Sbornik statei v chest’ D. F. Kobeko, pp. 225–236. St Petersburg, Tipografiia M. A. Aleksandrova Publ. (In Russian)

Khondzinskii P., Archpriest (2011) “Blessed Augustine in the Russian spiritual tradition of the 18th century”, in Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia, vol. 1 (33), pp. 22–36. (In Russian)

Khondzinskii P., Archpriest (2011) “The Holy Scripture in the theology of the school of Feofan Prokopovich”, in Russkoe bogoslovie: traditsii i sovremennost’, pp. 157–168. Moscow, Pravoslavnyi Sviato-Tikhonovskii gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Möhler J. A. (1834) Symbolik oder Darstellung der dogmatischen Gegensatze der Katholiken und Protestanten nach ihren öffentlichen Bekentnissschriften. Meinz; Vien, Florian Kupferberg.

Samarin Iu. F. (1880) Stefan Yavorsky and Feofan Prokopovich. Moscow, Tipografiia A. I. Mamontova i K. Publ. (In Russian)

Shonyu P. (2005) The civilization of classical Europe. Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriia Publ. (In Russian)

Stupperich R. (1940/1941) “Feofan Procopovič und seine academische Wirksamkeit”, in Zeitschrift für slavische Phililogie, Bd. XVII, S. 70–102.

Published

2023-03-22

Issue

Section

History of Christian Thought