Теология и государственно-религиозные отношения: к вопросу о теориях среднего уровня

Vsevolod V. Zolotukhin

doi:10.21638/spbu28.2023.401

Authors

Vsevolod V. Zolotukhin HSE University, 20, ul. Myasnitskaya, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation; Centre “State and Religion in Asia”, Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 32, Nakhimovsky pr., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4405-5543

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2023.401

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the problem how a theologian would treat religion-state relations field of research. This field is to describe by middle-range theories in comparison to other levels: philosophy of religion (high-range theories) and social anthropology (low-range theories). The middle range deals with religion as actual social practice involved in a regional culture context. In world cultures, there is a lot of original views on religion and theology, it is difficult to generalize them in a correct way. It would be better to understand theology as optics. This optics is an insider view on religious community and its doctrines, including in-depth knowledge of its traditions, practices and worldview. A theologian analyzes correlation between religious reality and normative rules of a tradition as well as seeks to point out probable traits and changes of religion in the future. The optics of theology towards religion-state relations comprises several hermeneutical methods applied to reconstruct meaning of key religious concepts or to compare present-day opinions with heritage of tradition. This focus contributes to understanding of religion as social, historical and political reality. Nevertheless, the optics of theology does not exclude methods of religious studies or philosophy of religion when necessary.

Keywords:

theology, religion-state relations, methodology, humanities, hermeneutics, Begriffsgeschichte, non-Western cultures

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Al-Khusht M.ʻU. (2001) Madkhal ila falsafat al-din [Introduction to Philosophy of Religion]. Cairo, Dar Quba’. (In Arabic)

Avanesov S. S. (2020) “On origin and meaning of the term “Theology”, in Vestnik RKhGA, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 11–28. (In Russian)

Bernoulli C. A. (1897) Die wissenschaftliche und die kirchliche Methode in der Theologie. Ein enzyklopädischer Versuch. Freiburg im Breisgau, J. C. B. Mohr.

Bongard-Levin G. M., ed. (1982) Buddhism, state and society in the countries of Central and East Asia in the Middle Ages: collection of papers. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Buswell R. E. Jr., Lopez Donald S. Jr., eds (2014) The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Cicero (1985) Treatises on Philosophy. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Delyusin L. P., ed. (1987) Buddhism and state in the Far East: collection of papers. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Fleischer D., ed. (2015) Johann Salomo Semler. Ob der Geist des Widerchrists unser Zeitalter auszeichne? In freimütigen Briefen zur Erleichterung der Privatreligion der Christen (1784) Mit Beilagen. Nordhausen, Verlag Traugott Bautz GmbH.

Jackson R. R., Makransky J. J., eds (2000) Buddhist Theology. Critical Reflections by Contemporary Buddhist Scholars. Richmond, Curzon Press.

Khondzinskiy P. V., Archpr. (2017) Metropolitan Philaret Drozdov’s Theological Synthesis as Solution for Problems of the 18th Century Russian Theology. PhD Thesis in Theology. Moscow, Pravoslavnyi Sviato-Tikhonovskii gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Kornev V. I. (1973) Thai Buddhism . Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Mel’nichenko B. N. (1996) Buddhism and royal power (Buddhism in the history of the Siamese state of the 13th — early 20th centuries). St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

Melʼnikov S. A. (2018) Introduction to Aristotle’s philosophy. 8 lectures for the “Magisteriya” project. Moscow, Rosebud Publishing. (In Russian)

Okita K. (2014) Hindu Theology in Early Modern South Asia. The Rise of Devotionalism and the Politics of Genealogy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Reischle M. (1889) Die Frage nach dem Wesen der Religion. Grundlegung zu einer Methodologie der Religionsphilosophie. Freiburg im Breisgau, J. C. B. Mohr.

Rudolph K. (1992) Geschichte und Probleme der Religionswissenschaft. Leiden, Brill.

Schmidt J. (2003) Philosophische Theologie. Grundkurs Philosophie 5. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer.

Semler J. S. (1786) Ueber historische, gesellschaftliche und moralische Religion der Christen. Leipzig, G. E. Beer.

Shinkarev V. N. (1997) Person in Tibeto-Burmese ethnic worldviews. Moscow, Institut etnologii i antropologii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaya RAN Publ. (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2019) “Scientific rationality and “return to theology”, in Issues of Theology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 280–306. (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2021) The Mystery of the Answer. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Sankt Peterburgskoi dukhovnoi akademii Publ.; Izdatel’stvo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena Publ. (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2022) “Identifying theology and philosophy of science”, in Voprosy filosofii, iss. 1, pp. 197–207. (In Russian)

Tsendina A. D. (2015) “The Buddhist reincarnation as field for political games by written Mongol sources in the 17th — Early 20th centuries”, in Strany i narody Vostoka. vol. XXXVI. Religiya na Vostoke, pp. 141–159. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Volkov S. V. (1985) Early History of Buddhism in Korea (Sangha and State) . Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Vsevolodov V. I. (1978) Burma: religion and politics. Buddhist Sangha and state. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)