The structure of an individual soul and the problem of “two minds” in the theology of Philo of Alexandria

Authors

  • Archpriest Maksim Prikhodko Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities, 15, nab. r. Fontanki, St Petersburg, 191011, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-5625

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2022.201

Abstract

The teaching of Philo the Alexandrian is a system of the regular intersection of theological and psychological lines of reasoning. The crucial point for the Judaic thinker was the rational explanation of religious doctrine. Philo manages to do this using the Stoics’ concept of soul and its action in the light of allegoric interpretations of the central points of Genesis, such as the creation of man and the first-fall of the Progenitors. Philo’s elaboration on the Stoics’ doctrine of the soul reveals the conceptual model of relationship between God and man based on the communication between the mind and the senses within a human soul. Philo finds the universal aspect of the action of an individual mind, whose disposition towards the senses either links it to the universe and God or closes it within itself and becomes a cause of vice. Philo uses the Stoics’ distinguishing of an individual mind (hegemonikon) and the universal logos to state the transitional function of the human mind regarding God and the universe. In terms of the Stoics’ concept of the rational nature of impulse, Philo explains man’s responsibility for the appearance of evil as well as the reason for seeking the cause of the universe and its place there. Thus, Philo shows the action of an individual soul both in the context of the living processes of the whole universe and in relation to God.

Keywords:

mind, reason, soul, sense, individuality, logos, Stoicism, governing principle, hegemonikon, universe, rational soul, irrational soul

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Annas J., ed., Woolf R., tr. (2004) Cicero. On Moral Ends. Cambridge University Press.

Daniélou J. (2014) Philo of Alexandria. Cambridge, James Clarke & Co.

Dillon J. M. (1996) The middle Platonists 80 B. C. to A. D. 220. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.

Goold G. P., ed., Colson F. H., Whitaker G. H., tr. (1929–1939) Philo. In 8 vols. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Kamesar A. (2004) “The Logos Endiathetos and the Logos Prophorikos in allegorical interpretation: Philo and the D-Scholia to the Iliad”, in Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, vol. 44, pp. 163–181.

Long A. A. (1986) Hellenistic philosophy. Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Pohlenz M. (1965) Die Begrundung der abendlandischen Sprachlehre durch die Stoa. Hildesheim, Kleine Schriften.

Prikhodko M. (2021) “Language and laughter in the treatise of Philo of Alexandria ‘The worse Attacks the Better’”, in Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 611–624.

Rist J. M. (1969) Stoic philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Robertson D. (2008) Word and meaning in Ancient Alexandria theories of language from Philo to Plotinus. Hampshire, Ashgate.

Runia D. T. (1988) “God and man in Philo of Alexandria”, in Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 39, pp. 48–75.

Svetlov R. V. (2020) “Rational theology: The case of Philo of Alexandria”, in Issues of Theology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–74. (In Russian)

Winston D. (1985) Logos and mystical theology in Philo of Alexandria. Cincinnati, Hebrew Union College Press.

Wolfson H. A. (1962) Philo foundations of religious philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. In 2 vols, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-17

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Theology: Texts and Contexts

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.