Christian theology and the principle of inertia in physics

Authors

  • Vladimir N. Katasonov Saints Cyril and Methodius Institute for Postgraduate Studies, 4/2, Pyatnitskaya ul., Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2022.302

Abstract

The article discusses the dependence of the formulation of law of inertia in classical mechanics on theological concepts of its time. It is shown that in medieval science, all attempts to solve the problem of motion of a thrown body were made within the framework of the Aristotelian understanding of motion as the actualization of the possible. Nevertheless, within the framework of the theory of impetus (John Philopon), medieval natural philosophers came close to the principle of preserving the amount of movement (Jean Buridan). Galileo, who himself began his work on the theory of motion with an attempt to mathematize the concept of impetus, in his mature works proceeded to a principled criticism of the Aristotelian understanding of motion. However, despite all the Socratic power of the Maevtic method, he failed to prove the law of inertia. Galileo’s virtuoso dialectic only allowed him to destroy all objections to the movement by inertia. Descartes gives a positive proof of the law of inertia, and the basis of his deduction is the theological thesis about the immutability of God. The law of inertia in the classical mechanics of Descartes and Newton was closely related to the thesis of the passivity of matter. The article shows that this thesis echoes the Protestant understanding (Luther’s) of the Christian way as the cultivation of passive righteousness, where all the activity of salvation is conditioned only by the action of God.

Keywords:

science and theology, Protestantism and classical mechanics, the law of inertia, Jean Buridan, Pierre Duhem, Anneliese Mayer, Galilee, Descartes, Newton, Luther

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Alexander H. G., ed. (1956) The Leibniz — Clark correspondence, together with excerpts from Newton’s Principles and Optics. Manchester, Manchester University Press.

Aristotle (1976) “Metaphysics”, in Aristotle. Essays. In 4 vols, vol. 1, pp. 63–368. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Aristotle (1981) “Physics”, in Aristotle. Essays. In 4 vols, vol. 3, pp. 59–262. Rus. ed. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Buridan J. (1974) “Questions on eight books of Physics. Paris, 1509”, in Grant E., ed. A textbook on Medieval science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Descartes R. (1989) “Reasoning about the method to guide your mind correctly and find the truth in the sciences”, in Descartes R. Essays. In 2 vols, vol. 1, pp. 250–296. Rus. ed. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Descartes R. (1989) “The origin of philosophy”, in Descartes R. Essays. In 2 vols, vol. 1, pp. 297–422. Rus. ed. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Duhem P. (1997) L’aube du savoir. Épitomé du Système du Monde. Paris, Hermann, Editeurs des Sciences et des Arts.

Galilee G. (1934) “Conversations and mathematical proofs concerning two new branches of science related to mechanics and local motion”, in Galilee G. Works. In 2 vols, vol. 1. Transl. by S. N. Dolgov. Rus. ed. Moscow; Leningrad, Gosudarstvennoe tekhniko-teoreticheskoe izdatel’stvo Publ. (In Russian)

Galilee G. (1964) “Lettre à Mme Christine de Lorraine, Grande-Duchesse de Toscane”. Traduction de Fr. Russo, in Revue d’histoire des sciences, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 338–368.

Galilee G. (2018) Dialogue about the two most important systems of the world. Transl. from Italian by A. I. Dolgov; intr. art. by I. S. Dmitriev; comments by A. I. Dolgov, Yu. G. Perel, I. B. Pogrebyssky. Rus. ed. Moscow, RIPOL Classic Publ. (In Russian)

Koyre A. (1923) Descartes und Scholastik. Bonn, Verlag von Friedrich Cohen.

Koyre A. (1939) Etudes Galiléennes. Paris, Hermann.

Koyre A. (1966) Etudes Galiléennes. 2nd ed. Paris, Hermann.

Koyre A. (1985) “On the influence of philosophical concepts on the development of scientific theories”. Transl. from French by A. Ya. Lyatker, in Koyre A. Essays on the history of philosophical thought, pp. 109–127. Rus. ed. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian)

Lindberg D. K., Numbers R. L., eds (1986) God and nature. Historical essays on the clash of Christianity and science. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London, University of California Press.

Newton I. (1989) Mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Transl. from Latin and comments by A. N. Krylov; foreword by L. S. Polak. Rus. ed. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Peters E., ed. (1982) On the threshold of exact science. Selected Works of Anneliese Mayer on Late Medieval Natural Philosophy. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Roux S. (2006) “Découvrir le principe d’inertie”, in Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage, vol. 24, pp. 453–515. Paris, Vrin.

Published

2022-09-22

Issue

Section

Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)