The doctrine of kenosis as the basis of Buddhist-Christian dialogue in the works of the philosophers of the Kyoto school

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2022.407

Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of one of the episodes of the Buddhist-Christian dialogue, which was actively held in the last decades of the 20th century. The immediate cause of the discussion was the work of the Japanese thinker Abe Masao (1915–2006) “Kenotic God and Dynamic Sunyata”, where Abe compared the Buddhist concept of emptiness and the Christian idea of kenosis, “the self-emptying of God”. Abe Masao was one of the representatives of the Kyoto School of Philosophy, which existed in Japan since the beginning of the 20th century, and the idea of comparing the concepts of emptiness and kenosis was also considered by other members of this philosophical community. The philosophers of the Kyoto School developed methods of interpreting kenosis using the paradoxical Mahayana logic of “simultaneous identification and differentiation” (soku-hi). This logic can be described by the formulas: “A is not A, and therefore A” or “A is if and only if A is not A”. The first paradoxical logic of soku-hi was formulated by D. T. Suzuki (1870–1966). Nishida Kitaro (1870–1945), the founder of the Kyoto School of Philosophy, and his followers used this idea in comparative studies of the basic concepts of Buddhism and Christianity. In conclusion, one of the ways of perception of Christianity by Japanese thinkers through the prism of Buddhist philosophical approaches is shown.

Keywords:

interreligious dialogue, kenosis, soku-hi logic, Kyoto school of philosophy, pure experience, non-duality in mahayana Buddhism, logic of the place

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Abe M. (1996) “Kenotic God and Dynamic Sunyata”, in Cobb J. Jr., Ives Ch., eds. The Emptying God: A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian conversation, pp. 3–68. Delhi, Sri Satguru Publ.

Carter R. E. (2013) The Kyoto school: an introduction. Albany, State University of New York Press.

Cobb J. Jr. (1996) “Preface”, in Cobb J. Jr., Ives Ch., eds. The Emptying God. A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian conversation, pp. IX–XI. Delhi, Sri Satguru Publ.

Cobb J. Jr., Ives Ch., eds (1996) The Emptying God. A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian conversation. Delhi, Sri Satguru Publ.

Faure B. (1995) “The Kyoto school and reverse orientalism”, in Fu Wei-Hsun Ch., Heine S., eds. Japan in traditional and postmodern perspectives, pp. 245–281. New York, SUNY Press.

Fujita M. (2018) “The scope of Nishida Kitaro’s theory of place”, in Fujita M., ed. The philosophy of the Kyoto school, pp. 13–22. Singapore, Springer Singapore.

Gunskii A. Yu. (2019) “Interpretation of the Shin teachings in the works of D. T. Suzuki”, in Humanities Research in the Russian Far East, vol. 48 (2), pp. 117–126. (In Russian)

Heidegger M. (2013) Was ist Metaphysik? Rus. ed. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)

Heisig J. W. (2001) Philosophers of Nothingness: An essay on the Kyoto school. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press.

Ilarion (Alfeev) (2016) “The crucified God: Juergen Moltman and his contribution to understanding of theological value of Jesus Christ’s death on the Cross”, in Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being, no. 5a, pp. 198–209. (In Russian)

Ives Ch. (1996) “Introduction”, in Cobb J. Jr., Ives Ch., eds. The Emptying God. A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian conversation, pp. XIII–XIX. Delhi, Sri Satguru Publ.

Karelova L. B. (2017) Key worldview problems in the twentieth century Japanese philosophy: Essays on history of philosophy) . Moscow, Institut filosofii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk Publ. (In Russian)

Keenan J. P. (1995) The Gospel of Mark: A Mahayana reading. New York, Orbis Books.

Keenan J. P. (2012) “Mahāyāna Emptiness or ‘Absolute Nothingness’? The ambiguity of Abe Masao’s role in Buddhist-Christian understanding”, in Théologiques, vol. 20, no. 1–2, pp. 341–363.

Keenan J. P. (2015) The emptied Christ of Philippians: Mahayana Meditations. Eugene, Wipf & Stock Publ.

Ketelaar James (1991) “Strategic occidentalism: Meiji Buddhists at the World’s Parliament of Religions”, in Buddhist-Christian Studies, vol. 11, pp. 37–56.

Mefodii (Zinkovskii) (2019) “Kenoticity as a hypostatic or personal property”, in Aktual’nye voprosy tserkovnoi nauki, no 2, pp. 218–227. (In Russian)

Melnik S. V. (2019) "Theology and interreligious dialogue: From controversy to cooperation", in Issues of Theology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 307–333. (In Russian)

Mikhalev A. A. (2010) The problem of culture in Japanese philosophy. K. Nishida and T. Watsuji. Moscow, Institut filosofii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk Publ. (In Russian)

Moltmann J. (1996) “God is unselfish love”, in Cobb J. Jr., Ives Ch., eds. The Emptying God. A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian Conversation, pp. 116–124. Delhi, Sri Satguru Publ.

Nishida K. (1987) Last writings: Nothingness and the religious worldview. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press.

Nishida K. (2018) “Place”, in Fujita M., ed. The philosophy of the Kyoto school, pp. 3–12. Singapore, Springer Singapore.

Nishitani Keiji. (1982) Religion and Nothingness. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press.

Nishitani Keiji. (1990) The self-overcoming of nihilism. Albany, State University of New York Press.

Odin S. (1987) “‘Kenosis’ as a foundation for Buddhist-Christian dialogue. The Kenotic Buddhology of Nishida and Nishitani of the Kyoto School in relation to the Kenotic Christology of Thomas J. J. Altizer”, in The Eastern Buddhist. New series, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 34–61.

Odin S. (1989) “A critique of the ‘Kenōsis/Śūnyatā’ motif in Nishida and the Kyoto School”, in Buddhist-Christian Studies, vol. 9, pp. 71–86.

Polivanov E. D. (1917) “On Russian transcription of Japanese words”, in Trudy iaponskogo otdela Imperatorskogo obshchestva vostokovedeniia, iss. 1, pp. 15–36. Petrograd, Tipografiia I. V. Leont’eva Publ. (In Russian)

Sharf R. H. (1995) “The Zen of Japanese nationalism”, in Lopez D. S., Jr., ed. Curators of the Buddha: The study of Buddhism under colonialism, pp. 107–160. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Shen V., ed. (2015) Chinese spirituality & Christian communities. A Kenotic perspective. Chinese Philosophical Studies, XXXI; Christian Philosophical Studies, XVII. Washington D. C., Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

Solonin K. Iu. (2001) “Heidegger and Japanese philosophy”, in Korneev M. Ia., Torchinov E. A., eds. Khaidegger i vostochnaia filosofiia: poiski vzaimodopolnitel’nosti kul’tur, pp. 183–274. St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo filosofskogo obshchestva Publ. (In Russian)

Suzuki D. T. (1996) Outlines of Mahayana Buddhism. Rus. ed. St Petersburg, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Suzuki D. T. (2002) Essays in Zen Buddhism. [In 3 parts] First series. Rus. ed. St Petersburg, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Suzuki D. T. (1996) Mysticism: Christian and Buddhist. Rus. ed. Kiev, Sofiia Publ. (In Russian)

Torchinov E. A. (1986) “On the psychological aspects of the Prajnaparamita teaching on the example of ‘Vajrachchedika-prajnaparamita-sutra’”, in Abaev N. V., ed. Psikhologicheskie aspekty buddizma, pp. 47–69. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Yusa M. (2019) “D. T. Suzuki and the ‘Logic of Sokuhi’, or the ‘Logic of Prajñāpāramitā’” in Kopf G., ed. The Dao Companion to Japanese Buddhist Philosophy, pp. 589–616. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-22

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022)

Section

Research

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.