Does anthropomorphism exist in the Islamic creed?

Authors

  • Musa K. Bagilov Dagestan Islamic University named after Sheikh Muhammad-Arif, 136, ul. Dakhadaeva, Makhachkala, Republic of Dagestan, 367000, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2023.304

Abstract

The article deals with the question of the inadmissibility of the idea of the articulation of Allah, the possibility of limiting It by space or movement, i. e. the inadmissibility of some similarity of the Almighty with His creations. Monotheism — which is the basis of the Islamic creed — means to be convinced of the uniqueness of Allah in his essence, in actions and attributes (sifat), which implies His absolute incomparability. A person comes to the idea of the similarity of Allah with His creations due to a misunderstanding of the verses of the Quran, due to the fact that he did not follow the path that the scientists paved, and did not follow them at all. The article also substantiates the position of Islamic scholars regarding the understanding and interpretation of those verses of the Quran and hadiths that falsely suggest thoughts of the likeness of Allah to his creations. This position manifests itself in two methods, which later became known as: tawil — interpretation of an obscure word, i. e. the selection of a suitable meaning from the paradigm of meanings of an obscure word that complies with the rules of the Arabic language and does not indicate a flaw in relation to Allah Almighty, and tafwiz — leaving the meanings of these words to the will of Allah, with conviction That Allah is not like any of His creations.

Keywords:

Islam, anthropomorphism, verses of the Quran, hadith of the Prophet, verses of mutashabihat, methods of interpretation of verses

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Abdul Azizi Al-Hadiri (2007) Tanzihul hakk. Maktaba Al-Yusr. (In Arabic)

Alauddin al-Mardawi (2000) At-Tahbir sharh at-Tahrir. In 8 vols, vol. 3. Riyadh, Maktaba ar-Rushd. (In Arabic)

Fakhruddin al-Razi (1999) I’tikadat firk al-Muslimin wal Mushrikin. Beirut, Dar al-Kutub al-Alamiya. (In Arabic)

Fakhruddin al-Razi (2017) Tasis at-Taqdis. Damascus, Daru at-Taqwa. (In Arabic)

Hafiz ibn Rajab (2000) Fadlu ilm as-salaf ala al-khalaf. Cairo, Al-Maktaba al-Azhariya li-Turas. (In Arabic)

Ibn al-Jawzi (1998) Daf fur coats at-tashbih. Cairo, Al-Maktaba al-Azhariya. (In Arabic)

Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (1957) Fath-ul-Bari. In 18 vols, vol. 6. Beirut, Dar al-Marifa. (In Arabic)

Ibn Kathir (1997) Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Azeem. In 19 vols, vol. 2, 3, 7. Beirut, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiya. (In Arabic)

Ibn Mujahid (2003) Risala ila Ahli Sagr. Medina, Imad al-Bahs al-Ilmi. (In Arabic)

Imam Abu Bakr al-Ismaili (1992) Itikad Ahlu Hadith. Riyadh, Dar al-Asima. (In Arabic)

Imam Abu Muzaffar al-Isfarayini (1983) at-Tabsira fi ad-din. Beirut, Alam al-Kutub. (In Arabic)

Imam an-Nawawi (1970) Sharh na Sahiha Muslim. In 10 vols, vol. 3. Beirut, Dar Ihya at-Turas. (In Arabic)

Imam as-Suyuti (1974) Al-Itqan fi `Ulyumi-l-Qur’an. Cairo, Al-Hay’a al-Misriya lil-Kitab. (In Arabic)

Imam at-Tabari (1996) At-Tabsyr. Riyadh, Dar al-Asima. (In Arabic)

Imam Badruddin az-Zarkashi. (1957) Al-Burhan. In 4 vols, vol. 1. Damascus, Dar Ihya al-Kutub. (In Arabic)

Imam Badruddin ibn Jama’a (1990) Id’ahu Dalil. Cairo, Dar as-Salam. (In Arabic)

Imam Ghazali (2008) Al-Iqtisad fil I’tiqad. Jeddah, Dar al-Minhaj. (In Arabic)

Imam Ghazali (2017) Iljamul Awam. Jeddah, Dar al-Minhaj. (In Arabic)

Magomedov T. K. (2022) “Features of the argumentation of the permissibility or prohibition of the use of certain names (al’asma’) and/or attributes (alsifat) in relation to the Almighty Allah”, in Minbar. Islamic Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 164–176. https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2022-15-1-164-176 (In Russian)

Muwaffaq ibn Kudama al-Maqdisi (2002) Raud al-Nazir. In 2 vols, vol. 1. Beirut, Muassisa ar-Rayan. (In Arabic)

Said Fuda (2016) Tanzihu Rahman. Amman, Al-Aslein. (In Arabic)

Shagaviev D. A., Siniatullin R. Kh. (2016) “Understanding attributes of Allah in ayat’s mutashabihat (allegorical ayat’s)”, in Minbar. Islamic Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–42. https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2016-9-1-31-42 (In Russian)

Shamsuddin ibn Muflikh (1999) Usul. In 2 vols, vol. 1. Cairo, Maktaba al-Obeikan. (In Arabic)

Published

2023-09-29

Issue

Section

Research