Heroism and holiness in the aspect of Orthodox theology

Authors

  • Oleg K. Shevchenko V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, 4, ul. Academika Vernadskogo, Simferopol, 295007, Russian Federation
  • Mariia A. Podlesnaia Institute of Sociology Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, ul. Bol’shaya Andron’evskaya, Moscow, 109544, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2159-4958

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2024.407

Abstract

In the article, the authors formulate three universal postulates of the connection between the heroic and the sacred, characteristic of any European culture from Antiquity to the present day: “A hero is always a sufferer”; “A hero is always a tragic figure”; “A hero is a figure separated or separated from society, policy, family, history, common sense”. In Christianity (as in Hellas, Ancient Rome or Islam), these three postulates acquire their semantic texture. Heroism is comprehended as nothing more than determination and readiness for personal suffering for the sake of an allgood goal overshadowed by God’s will. A voluntary decision, or rather a compulsion of oneself to daily cooperation with God’s will with the awareness of the tragic result of one’s personal earthly existence. Heroism is rather a willingness and a state of compelling oneself to do. But holiness comprehends suffering, gives it deep content and consolation, which is higher than the worldly sadness of separation from society or the usual way of life. Postulates, hypotheses and intermediate conclusions are tested on the empirical material of the All-Russian survey conducted in 2023 (eight federal districts of the Russian Federation, 1350 respondents). Particular attention is paid to the answers of two categories of respondents: practicing (551) and nonpracticing (638) believers.

Keywords:

hero, heroism, saint, holiness, ancient hero, holy ascetic of Christianity, free will, relationship between God and personality, relationship between man and man

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Dal’ V. I. (1989) Explanatory dictionary of the living great Russian language. Available at: https://gufo.me/dict/dal (accessed: 09.12.2024). (In Russian)

Didkovskaya V. G. (2019) “Feat, devotee, hero”, in Uchenye zapiski Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 2 (20), pp. 28–32. (In Russian)

Donati P. (2019) Relational theory of society: Social life from the point of view of social realism. Moscow, Pravoslavnyi Sviato-Tikhonovskii gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Geffken J., Ziebart E., eds (1914) A real dictionary of classical antiquities. Teubner. Available at: https://rus-clasic-antiquities.slovaronline.com/2049-HEROY (accessed: 04.12.2024). (In Russian)

Krylov G. A., comp. (2005) Etymological dictionary of the Russian language. St. Petersburg, Poligrafuslugi Publ. (In Russian)

Lavrenova S. A. (2022) “Dignity, freedom and human rights: A comparative analysis of the teachings of the Roman Catholic and Russian Orthodox churches”, in Issues of Theology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 134–150. http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2022.107 (In Russian)

Lebedev A. Yu. (2022) “The problem of free will in Eastern and Western Christianity”, in Issues of Theology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 619–639. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2022.405 (In Russian)

Losev D. V., Malenko S. A., Nekita A. G. (2019) “The mythological basis of the superhero genre in American cinema”, in Mif v istorii, politike, kul’ture: sbornik materialov III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi mezhdistsiplinarnoi konferentsii, Sevastopol’, 26–27 iiunia 2019 g. Eds O. A. Gabrielyan, A. V. Stavitsky, V. V. Khapaev, S. V. Yurchenko, pp. 154–157. Sevastopol, Filial Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni M. V. Lomonosova v gorode Sevastopole Publ. (In Russian)

Luther M. (1986) “On the bondage of the will”, in Erasmus of Rotterdam. Philosophical works, pp. 290–545. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Massumi B. (2020) “Autonomy of affect”, in Filosofskii zhurnal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 110–133. (In Russian)

Mikhailovsky N. K. (1885) Essays. In 6 vols, vol. 6. St. Petersburg, Tipo-litografiia B. M. Vel’fa Publ. (In Russian)

Mineralova I. G. (2020) “Holiness and heroism in the lyrics of the Great Patriotic War”, in VIII Paskhal’nye chteniia: materialy Vosemnadtsatoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii, Moskva, 24–25 aprelia 2020 g., pp. 3–19. Yaroslavl, Litera Publ. (In Russian)

Naidysh V. M. (2023) “Hellenic theology of the epoch of High Classics”, in Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Filosofiia, vol. 27 no. 1, pp. 79–93. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-1-79-93 (In Russian)

Rastimeshina T. V. (2010) “Hero and saint — multidirectional vectors of improvement”, in Vestnik Moskovskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii delovogo administrirovaniia. Seriia: Filosofskie, sotsial’nye i estestvennye nauki, no. 1, pp. 86–100. (In Russian)

Ryzhov V. A. (2023) “Geography of Russian epics of the Kyiv cycle”, in Voennoe obozrenie. Available at: https://topwar.ru/202586-geografija-russkih-bylin-kievskogo-cikla.html (accessed: 04.12.2024). (In Russian)

Schenk F. B. (2007) Alexander Nevsky in Russian cultural memory: Saint, Ruler, national Hero (1263–2000). Transl. from German by E. Zemskova, M. Lavrinovich. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russian)

Semenov P. A. (2021) “Hero and saint in the Russian picture of the world of the 13th century (to the 800th anniversary of Alexander Nevsky)”, in Perevod. Iazyk. Kul’tura: materialy XII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 28–29 maia 2021 g., pp. 6–12. St. Petersburg, Leningradskii gosudarstvennyi universitet imeni A. S. Pushkina Publ. (In Russian)

Yampolskaya A. V. (2014) “From passivity to affectivity”, in (Post)fenomenologiia: novaia fenomenologiia vo Frantsii i za ee predelami. Comp. by S. A. Sholokhov, A. V. Yampolskaya, pp. 229–241. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2024-12-28

Issue

Section

Research