Theology and interreligious dialogue: from controversy to cooperation

Authors

  • Sergey V. Melnik Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Science, Nakhimovsky pr., 51/21, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation; Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate, ul. Danilovskii val, 22, Moscow, 115191, Russian Federation; Interreligious Coincil of Russia, ul. Danilovskii val, 22, Moscow, 115191, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2019.302

Abstract

The article considers the original classification of four types of interreligious dialogue as follows: 1. Intention (the motivation to come into contact with a representative of another religion); 2. Goal (tasks and goals pursued by the participants in the dialogue); 3. Principles (the starting points, which determine the interaction); 4. Form (participants in the dialogue, meeting form). Among the most important criterion is intention, which identifies the types of polemical, peacemaking, cognitive and partnership dialogue. These types of dialogue are aligned respectively around the following questions: Who is right?, How can we live together peacefully?, Who are you? and What can we do to improve the world?. The place of theology in each type of interreligious dialogue is examined. In the context of religious pluralism, the spread of new religious movements, as well as a tendency towards convergence of religions, theology has not lost its importance as a tool to protect one’s faith and provided a reasoned justification of its benefits. In the framework of cognitive dialogue, the significance of theology is analyzed in such areas as theology of religions, the formation of attitudes towards followers of other religions, comparative theology, and spiritual dialogue. One of the main strategies for peacemaking dialogue is to identify the similarities of religious worldviews in dogma and ethics.
Three areas of cooperation of religions in partnership dialogue are distinguished: “individual,” “society,” and “environment.” The role of theology is to identify possible paths and comprehend the conceptual grounds for interreligious cooperation. The author comes to the conclusion that the place of theology in the field of interreligious relations is wide and diverse. Consideration of this complex problem requires specification, that is clarification of the role of theology in various types of interreligious dialogue — polemical, peacemaking, cognitive and partnership, as well as their subspecies.

Keywords:

interreligious dialogue, interreligious relations, types, religion, religious factor, theology, exclusiveness, polemics, peacemaking, cooperation, theology of religions, inclusion, comparative theology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Appleby S. (2000)The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence and Reconciliation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Berger P. L. (1999) “Desecularization of the world: a global overview”, in P. L. Berger (ed.) The desecularization of the world: resurgent religion and world politics. Washington: Ethics and Public Policy Center, W. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., pp. 1–18.

Bethune P.-F. (2013) “Monastic inter-religious dialogue”, in C. Cornille (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 34–50.

Bormans M. “Two religions: common doctrinal grounds and points of contact in different social spheres” in Khristiane i musul’mane: problemy dialoga, sost. A. V. Zhuravskii. Moscow, Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. apostola Andreia Publ., 2000, pp. 533–611. (In Russian).

Byrne M. (2011) The Names of God in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: Basis for Interfaith Dialogue. London; New York: Continuum.

Byzantine Writings on Islam (translated texts and comments), transl. from Greek by Iu. V. Maksimov, E. P. Orekhanova; ed. by Iu. V. Maksimova. Moscow, PSTGU Publ., 2012. (In Russian).

Clooney F. X. (2013) “Comparative theology and inter-religious dialogue”, in C. Cornille (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 51–63.

Clooney F. X. (1995) “The emerging field of comparative theology: a bibliographical review (1989–95)”, in Theological Studies, vol. 56, iss. 3, pp. 521–550.

Cornille C. (2008) The Im-possibility of interreligious dialogue. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.

Dalmair F. (2013) “The secular age? Reflections on Charles Taylor and Raimon Panikkar”, in Voprosy filosofii, no. 10, pp. 77–90. (In Russian)

Dat L. S. (2013) An analytical study of inter-religious understanding: A Buddhist perspective. Patiala,Punjabi University.

Dispute of Nachmanides (2008), transl., comment. and afterword by B. Khaskelevicha. Moscow, Knizhniki Publ. (In Russian)

Fletcher J. H. (2013) “Women in inter-religious dialogue”, in C. Cornille (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 168–184.

Hedges P. (2016) “Comparative Theology and Hermeneutics: A Gadamerian Approach to Interreligious Interpretation”, in Religions, vol. 7, no 7, pp. 1–20.

Ingram P. O. (2013) “Christian–Buddhist dialogue”, in C. Cornille (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 376–393.

Khromtsova M. Iu. “Trinitarian approach of modern theology and the problem of interreligious dialogue”, in Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, 2016, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 74–86. (In Russian)

Kirill, Patriarkh Moskovskii i vseia Rusi (2016) Freedom and responsibility: in search of harmony. Human rights and dignity of Person. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskoi Patriarkhii Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi. (In Russian)

Kirill, Patriarkh Moskovskii i vseia Rusi. (2018) Think about the future of humanity. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskoi Patriarkhii Publ., 2018. (In Russian)

Knitter P. F. (1995) Earth, many religions. Multifaith dialogue and Global responsibility. New York, Orbis.

Knitter P. F. (2013) “Inter-religious dialogue and social action”, in C. Cornille (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 117–132.

Madigan D. (2013) “Christian–Muslim dialogue”, in C. Cornille (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to inter-religious dialogue. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 244–260.

Mel’nik S. V. (2018) “Classification of types of interreligious dialogue: analysis of existing approaches”, in Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkovʼ v Rossii i za rubezhom, no. 4, pp. 87–118. (In Russian)

Mel’nik S. V. (2017) Orthodoxy and Hasidism of HABAD: Personal Model of Interreligious Dialogue. Moscow, RAN INION Publ. (In Russian)

Merrigan T., Friday J. (eds) (2017) The Past, Present, and Future of Theologies of Interreligious Dialogue. Oxford U. K., Oxford University Press.

Moe D. (2001) “From a Trinitarian Theology of Religion to a Trinitarian Theology of Religions: Bridging ‘First Theology’ and ‘Second Theology’ ”, in The Expository Times, vol. 130, iss. 7,pp. 1–20.

Moyaert M. (2013) “Interreligious Dialogue”, in D. Cheetham, D. Pratt, and D. Thomas (eds.) Understanding Interreligious Relations. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 193–217.

Moyaert М. (2017) “Ricoeur and the wager of interreligious ritual participation”, in International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 173–199.

Osipov A. I. (2014) The Path of reason in search of the truth. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Sretenskogo monastyria Publ. (In Russian)

Payne D. P. (2017) “Towards an Orthodox Understanding of Religious Freedom: An Exploration of the Theological Resources for Engaging Religious Pluralism”, in Journal of Church and State, vol. 59, iss. 4, pp. 608–625.

Polosin A.-V. S. (2006) The Gospel through the Eyes of a Muslim. Two Views on the same Story. Moscow, Umma Publ. (In Russian)

Polosin A.-V. S. (2004) Why I became a Muslim. The direct way to God. Moscow, Priamoi put’ Publ. (In Russian)

Ratzinger J. (Benedictus XVI). (2007) Faith. Truth. Tolerance. Christianity and world religions. Moscow, Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. apostola Andreia Publ. (In Russian)

R. Panikkar about the meeting of religions. Compiling and translation by Maksim Demchenko. http://baznica.info/article/o-vstreche-religii/ (accessed: …). (In Russian)

Serafim (Rouz), ieromonakh. (2006) Orthodoxy and religion of the future. Moscow, Russkii Palomnik Publ. (In Russian)

Seredkina E. V. Küng’s “World Ethos” and modern Confucianism in the Dialogue of Cultures. http://anthropology.ru/ru/text/seredkina-ev/mirovoy-etos-g-kyunga-i-sovremennoe-konfucianstvo-v-dialoge-kultur (accessed: 08.08.2019). (In Russian)

Shokhin V. K. (1997) “Dialogue of religions: ideology and practice”, in Al’fa i Omega, no. 1(12), pp. 281–295. (In Russian)

Singh K., Clark J. S. (eds) (2016) Voices from Religions on Sustainable Development. Berlin: German Federal Ministry for Economic Development and Cooperation. http://www.partner-religion-development.org/fileadmin/Dateien/Resources/Knowledge_Center/Voices_from_Religions_on_Sustainable_Development_April2017_3rd_edition.pdf (accessed:08.08.2019).

Вопросы теологии, Том 1, № 3, 2019

Downloads

Published

2019-11-01

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019)

Section

Research

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.