Methods of academic theology (pro et contra of Bernard Lonergan)

Authors

  • Priest Aleksey Vasiliev Ss. Cyril and Methodius Theological Institute of Postgraduate and Doctoral Studies, 4/2, Pyatnitskaya ul., Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article is devoted to the development of special aspects of the methodology of academic theology, determined by the internal methods of Orthodox dogmatic theology. The development of methods of theology is becoming an urgent problem of academic theology in the modern Russian educational space in connection with the approval of the Higher Attestation Commission of the new specialty 26.00.01 “Theology”. Taking into account the specifics of the subject of theology as a new academic discipline, problematic questions remain on the applicability of the research methods of the humanities and natural sciences in it. A separate task is to develop our own method of Orthodox theology. The experience of foreign theology includes not only hermeneutical methods, conditioned by textual research, but also epistemological methods conditioned by the research of the meaning and structure of the theological cognition of reality. The foreign experience contains several developments by authors, one of which is the methodological approach of Bernard Lonergan, described in the work Method in Theology. Lonergan’s method has a neo-Thomistic origin, therefore it is not able to reflect the notion fundamental for Orthodox theology — irreducibility of the hypostatic existence of God and man to the existence of the same entities. This is largely due to the Western problem of the Latin theological inculturation of the Eastern concept of “hypostasis”, created on the basis of Greek-language ancient philosophy. However, the humanitarian potential of Lonergan’s method allows the theologian to systematize and structure the sequence of cognitive operations when performing a wide range of theological studies. The principle of hypostasis, which preserves the fullness of Orthodox theology in academic theology, is followed by the method of antinomination of theological judgments, created by Chalcedonian theology to express the hypostatic unity of incompatible entities.

Keywords:

academic theology, method of theology, science and theology, science and culture, concept, antinomy, antinomination

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


References

Bakhtin M. M. (1979) “On the methodology of the humanities”, in Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva, pp. 381–393. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)

Bazhanov V. A. (2009) N. A. Vasiliev and his imaginary logic. Resurrection of one forgotten idea. Moscow, Canon+, Rehabilitation Publ. (In Russian)

Kovrevskaya V. E. (2015). “B. Lonergan’s transcendental method and hermeneutics”, in Osnovnye problemy obshchestvennykh nauk: sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (10 oktiabria 2015 g.), iss. 2, pp. 57–59. Volgograd, Innovative Center for the Development of Education and Science Publ. (In Russian)

Lonergan B. (2010) Method in theology. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy, Theology and History of St. Thomas Publ. (In Russian)

Polskov K. O. (2015) “Theological method the vs method in theology”, in Filosofiia i kul’tura, no. 9 (93), pp. 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.7256/1999-2793.2015.9.13979. (In Russian)

Stepanov Yu. S. (2004) Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture. 3rd ed., pp. 42–67. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proect Publ. Available at: http://ec-dejavu.ru/c/Concept.html (accessed: 22.12.2020). (In Russian)

Tatarskaya D. A. (2014) “The idea of ‘concept’ in the studies of culture”, in MGIMO Review of International Relations, vol. 4 (37), pp. 287–293. (In Russian)

Tonoyan L. G. (2010) “The Imaginary Logic of Nikolai Vasiliev in the light of Christian Epistemology”, in Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 170–184. (In Russian)

Vasiliev A. A. (2011) “Logical following of Aristotle and the logic of Christian antinomy”, in Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 160–167. (In Russian)

Vasiliev N. A. (1910) “On particular judgments, on the triangle of opposites, on the law of the excluded fourth”, in Uchenye zapiski Imperatorskogo Kazanskogo universiteta, October, pp. 1–47. (In Russian)

Vasiliev N. A. (1912) “Imaginary (non-Aristotelian) logic”, in Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniia, August, pp. 207–246. (In Russian)

Vasiliev N. A. (1989) Imaginary logic. Selected Works. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Vasilyev N. A. (1912–1913) “Logic and meta-logic”, in Logos, books 1–2, pp. 53–81. (In Russian)

Vdovina G. V. (2013) “Bernard Lonergan: method in theology and humanities”, in Philosophical Journal, vol. 2 (11), pp. 5–18. (In Russian)

Вопросы теологии, Том 3, № 2

Downloads

Published

2021-07-16

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Research

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.