The concept of sobornost’ and the problem of church authority in Russian theology late 19th — early 20th centuries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2021.407

Abstract

This article is devoted to the problematization of the idea of сhurch authority in Russian theology at the turn of the epochs, which is considered on the basis of the emergence and development of the concept of sobornost’. The reconstruction of the polemical context of A. Khomyakov allows the interpretation of the texts of which the concept of sobornost’ is included in theological thought. It also makes it possible to connect the problem of the authority of hierarchy with the idea of sobornost’ of the Church. In addition to the “Khomyakovsky” context, the author refers to three other authors, considered in chronological order. First, this concerns a collection of articles by Fr. A. Ivantsov-Platonov, in which he interprets the idea of sobornost’ designating it as an ideal characteristic of church structure. Here sobornost’ is associated with conciliar rule, which was not directly suggested by Khomyakov’s concept, and becomes a marker of (un)canonicity. Secondly, the author turns to the spiritual-academic theology at the beginning of the century, in which “sobornost’” is developed at two levels — institutional and mystical. This attempt receives the greatest meaningful development in the texts of Metropolitan Archbishop Antony (Khrapovitsky), who substantiates the authority of the hierarchy through the development of “personalistic” sobornost’ and the idea of the pastoral “compassionate love” for parishioners. Thirdly, the author considers the documents of the 1917–1918 Local Council in the focus of the connection between sobornost’ and church authority. It is concluded that the inclusion of the idea of sobornost’ into the context of academic theology leads to the formulation of the idea of the hierarchy’s authority, which was expressed in the construction of a new image of patriarchal ministry at the Council.

Keywords:

Russian academic theology, ecclesiology, sobornost’, ecclesiastical authority, patriarchy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Akvilonov E. P. (1894) The Church. Science definition of the Church and Apostol’s learning about it as a Christ’s body. St. Petersburg, Tipografiia A. Katanskogo i Ko Publ. (In Russian)

Akvilonov E. P. (1896) New Testament doctrine about the Church: Experience of the dogmatic research. St. Petersburg, Pechatnia S. P. Iakovleva Publ. (In Russian)

Akvilonov E. P. (1905) On the Sobornost’ of the Church in connection with the question of the restoration of the All-Russian Patriarchate. St. Petersburg, Tipografiia Uchilishcha glukhonemykh Publ. (In Russian)

Anthony Khrapovitsky, metropolitan (1911) Complete works. In 3 vols. St. Petersburg, I. L. Tuzov Publ. (In Russian)

Anthony Khrapovitsky, metropolitan (2007) Selected works. Letters. Materials. Moscow, Pravoslavnyi Sviato-Tikhonovskii gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Beglov A. L. (2016) “All-Russian Church Council 1917–1918 as a manifestation of the conciliar practice of the Church”, in Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, no. 1 (34), pp. 51–73. (In Russian)

Beglov A. L., ed. (2017) Documents of the Holy Council of the Orthodox Russian Church of 1917–1918. Vol. 14: Documents of the Department of monasteries and monasticism. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Novospasskogo monastyria Publ. (In Russian)

Borsch I. V. (2008) Russian Science of Church Law in the First Half of the 20th Century: The Search for Methodology. Moscow, URSS Publ. (In Russian)

Chomiakoff A. (1872) L’Eglise latine et le Protestantisme au point de vue de l’Eglise d’Orient. 2nd ed. Lausanne, Vevey, B. Benda Publ.

Destivelle H. (2008) The Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church of 1917–1918 and the Principle of Sobornost’. Moscow, Krutitskoe podvor’e Publ. (In Russian)

Dmitriev A. P. (2018) “N. P. Gilyarov-Platonov and Yu. F. Samarin in the work on the publication of the theological heritage of A. S.
Khomyakov”, in Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 121–129. (In Russian)

Fetisenko O., ed. (2015) “I loved you with the love of a brother…”: Сorrespondence between Yu. F. Samarin and Baroness E. F. Raden (1861‒1876) . St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)

Fokin A. A. (2018) “Metropolitan Macarius (Bulgakov) and the catholic romantic ecclesiology in Germany (by the case of Heinrich Klee’s theology)”, in Filaretovskii al’manakh, no. 14, pp. 117–134. (In Russian)

Gezen A. M. (1884) The history of the Slavic translation of the Creed. St. Petersburg, Tipografiia Imperatorskoi Akademii nauk Publ. (In Russian)

Hilarion (Troitsky) (2004) Works. In 3 vols, vol. 1. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Sretenskogo monastyria Publ. (In Russian)

Ivantsov-Platonov A. M., prot. (1898) About the Russian Church Government. St. Petersburg, Tipografiia A. A. Porohovshchikova Publ. (In Russian)

Karelina L. A. (2021) “The Doctrine of the Church of St. Sylvester Malevansky in the context of ecclesiological discussions of the last third of the 19th — early 20th century”, in Trudy Kievskoi dukhovnoi akademii, no. 34, pp. 51–65. (In Russian)

Khomyakov A. S. (1886) Complete works. In 8 vols, vol. 2. Moscow, Universitetskaia tipografiia Publ. (In Russian)

Khondzinskii P., prot. (2014) “On the Source of the Question from a ‘Biographer’ of the St. Sergius of Radonezh in Prince E. N. Trubetskoy’s Lecture ‘Speculation in colors’”, in Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Ser. 1. Theology. Philosophy, no. 6 (57), pp. 9–20. (In Russian)

Khondzinskii P., prot. (2017) “The Church Is Not an Academy”: Russian Non-academic Theology of the 19th Century. Moscow, Pravoslavnyi Sviato-Tikhonovskii gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Khondzinskii P., prot. (2019) “The Idea of ‘Personalizing’ the Church in Russian Theology in the Second Half of the 19th — Early 20th Centuries”, in Vestnik Ekaterinburgskoi dukhovnoi seminarii, no. 4 (28), pp. 125–130. (In Russian)

Khondzinsky P. V., Kyrlezhev A. I. (2019) “Sobornost’ in the Russian theological tradition”, in Issues of Theology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 427–440. (In Russian)

Kolcherin A., priest, Mramornov A. I., eds (2015) Documents of the Holy Council of the Orthodox Russian Church of 1917–1918. Vol. 5: Acts of the Council from the 1st to the 36th. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Novospasskogo monastyria Publ. (In Russian)

Lavrov V. M., Lobanov V. V., Lobanova I. V., Mazyrin A. V. (2008) The Hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church, the Patriarchate and the State in the Revolutionary Era. Moscow, Russkaia Panorama Publ. (In Russian)

Linitskii P. I. (1884) “About the defense of Slavophilism in the ‘Orthodox Review’”, in Trudy Kievskoi dukhovnoi akademii, no. 1, pp. 77–94. (In Russian)

Lourie B. (2020) “‘Conciliarity’: the emergence of a term and concept in the writings of Pseudo-Khomyakov”, in Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion, no. 1, pp. 72–88. (In Russian)

Mansvetov I. F. (1879) The New Testament Doctrine of the Church. Sergiev Posad, Tipografiia E. Lissnera i Iu. Romana Publ. (In Russian)

Mrowczynski-Van A., Obolevitch T., Rojek E., eds (2019) Alexei Khomiakov: The mystery of sobornost’. Oregon, Pickwick Publ.

Muretov M. D. (1913) “[Review of:] Troitsky V. Outlines from the History of the Dogma about the Church. Sergiev Posad, 1912”, in Bogoslovskii vestnik. vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 373–388. (In Russian)

Oravecz J. (2014) God as love: The concept and spiritual aspects of Agape in modern Russian religious thought. Grand Rapids, Eerdmans Publ.

Pavliuchenkov N. N. (2018) “The St. Philaret of Moscow’s doctrine of the Church and ecclesiological ‘search’ 19th — early 20th centuries”, in Filaretovskii al’manakh, iss. 14, pp. 89–114. (In Russian)

Polunov A. Iu., Solov’ev I. V., eds (2004) Reviews of diocesan bishops on the issue of church reform. In 2 vols. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Krutitskogo podvor’ia Publ. (In Russian)

Samarin Iu. F. (1880) Works. In 12 vols, vol. 5. Moscow, Tipografiia A. I. Mamontova I Ko Publ. (In Russian)

Sil’vestr (Malevanskii), archimandrite (1872) Church Doctrine in the first three centuries of the Christianity. Kiev, Kievo-Pecherskaia Lavra Publ. (In Russian)

Sil’vestr (Malevanskii), bishop (1897) The Experience of Orthodox Dogmatic Theology (with a historical exposition of dogmas). In 5 vols, vol. 4. Kiev, Tipografiia Korchak-Novitskogo Publ. (In Russian)

Smirnov F. I. (1883) “The theological teaching of the Slavophiles before the court of Prof. Linitsky”, in Pravoslavnoe obozrenie, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 273–295. (In Russian)

Solovyov I., priest (2018) “Embodying the Idea of Sobornost’ within the 1917–1918 All-Russian Local Council”, in Vestnik Sviato-Filaretovskogo instituta, no. 26, pp. 111–126. (In Russian)

Sukhova N. Iu. (2006) Higher Religious School: Problems and Reforms (Second Half of the 19th Century). Moscow, Pravoslavnyi Sviato-Tikhonovskii gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russian)

Trubetskoi E. N. (1916) Speculation in Color. Moscow, Tovarishchestvo I. D. Sytina Publ. (In Russian)

Valliere P. (2014) Conciliarism: A History of Decision-Making in The Church. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Valliere P. (2016) “The Conciliar Fellowship of the Church in Karl Barth and Modern Orthodox Theology”, in Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Orthodox Tradition Hardcover. Eds A. Moyse, S. Kirkland, J. McDowell, pp. 3–33. Minneapolis, Fortress Publ.

Valliere, P. (2004) “The Modernity of Khomiakov”, in A. S. Khomiakov: Poet, philosopher, theologian. Ed. by V. Tsurikov, pp. 129‒144. Jordanville, Holy Trinity Seminary Publ.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-28

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021)

Section

Research

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.