Theology in a new paradigm

Authors

  • Dmitrii V. Shmonin St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2023.309

Abstract

Interview with Dmitry Shmonin, Director of the Institute of Theology of St. Petersburg University, professor of St. Petersburg Orthodox Theological Academy and ss. Cyril and Methodius Institute for Postgraduate and Doctoral Studies, Chairman of the Expert Council of the Higher Attestation Commission under the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia in Theology, editor-in-Chief of the journal “Issues of Theology”. D. V. Shmonin is devoted to the place and role of theology in the domestic academic and educational space. Topics covered include: theology and worldview; normativity of theology in modern society; confessionality of theology; the specificity of religious thinking in the three Abrahamic traditions, as well as in Buddhism; theology and religious tradition; criticism in theology as a science; the importance of ancient and medieval heritage; the specifics of the domestic experience of the presence of theology in the educational space. Questions were raised about the status of the so-called ecumenical theology and the Anglo-American “philosophy of religion” as a non-denominational apologetic theology. The relationship between the dogmatic core of theology and scientific and theological research “on the margins” of this unchanging core is discussed. The author proposes, in connection with theology, to talk about a new educational paradigm that does not repeat the ancient one, which is impossible in modern conditions, but draws valuable and relevant from it. The main task is to secure a reliable place for theology in the domestic context as an academic discipline (or a set of disciplines) within the framework of modern humanitarian knowledge, including that transmitted in the educational process. This talk is a contribution to the ongoing debate about theology as a science, both institutionally and substantively.

Keywords:

theology, science, worldview, normativity, Abrahamic religions, ecumenical theology, theological creativity, higher education, humanitarian knowledge

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Bradshaw D. (2012) Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom. Rus. ed. Transl. by A. I. Kyrlezhev, A. R. Fokin. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur Publ. (In Russian)

Makarii (Bulgakov), metropolitan (1999) Introduction to Orthodox Theology. Tutaev, Pravoslavnoe Bratstvo sviatykh kniazei Borisa i Gleba. (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2002) Focus of metaphysics. The order of being and the experience of knowledge in the philosophy of Francisco Suarez. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State Mining Institute (Technical University). (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2006) In the shadow of the Renaissance: The second Scholastics in Spain. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2018) Technology of good: Essays on the theology of education. Moscow, Poznanie Publ. (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2021) The mystery of response: An introduction to rational theology. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskoi dukhovnoi akademii Publ., Izgatel’stvo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena Publ. (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2022) “Theology and Philosophy of Science: Problems of Identification”, in Voprosy filosofii, no. 1, pp. 197–207. (In Russian)

Shmonin D. V. (2022) Theology and the University. Textbook for graduate students of theological specialties. Moscow, Moscow Architectural Institute Publ. (In Russian)

Taylor Ch. (2017) A secular age. Rus. ed. Moscow, St. Andrews’s Biblical Theological Institute Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2023-09-29

Issue

Section

Conversations