The development of comparative Jewish hermeneutics of the Gospel of Matthew

Authors

  • Abay Trupbergenov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4996-9134

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2024.103

Abstract

The article examines the historical development of comparative Jewish hermeneutic studies of the Gospel of Matthew starting with the 17th century. The research pays special attention to the stages of formation, to obstacles and their overcoming, and to the nature of the development of comparative works. It introduces a comparison of two parallel traditions in these studies — Christian and Jewish. The main methodological approaches of Christian and Jewish scholars come from historical criticism and philology. They transcend religious boundaries and bring academicism to comparative studies. However, later historical criticism leads to a delay in the development of comparative Jewish studies due to the problems of anachronism, since rabbinic literature originates several hundred years after the New Testament, and therefore is not suitable for synchronous comparison. Another obstacle to the development of comparative analysis poses the philological principle of only one textual meaning. Jewish hermeneutics presupposes many meanings of the sacred text, which contradicts the principle of a single meaning. A revolutionary breakthrough in comparative Jewish hermeneutics occurs in the middle of the 20th century, thanks to the use of a literary approach that is not bound by the strict rules of historical criticism and the philological principle of a single meaning. Renee Bloch suggests the use of Rabbinic literature for the study of Christian and intertestamental literature, and even of the Bible itself, even though such a comparison is anachronistic. The cultural approach helps to see the uniqueness of the cultural contribution of the exegete and to overcome religious obstacles to comparative research. The article suggests a comparative Jewish hermeneutics of the Christmas story of the Gospel of Matthew.

Keywords:

Jewish hermeneutics, apostolic hermeneutics, the Gospel of Matthew, the Christmas story, supernatural birth, historical criticism, historical and grammatical approach, literary approach, cultural approach

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Bloch R. (1955) “Note méthodologique pour l’étude de la Littérature rabbinique”, in Recherches de Science Religieuse, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 194–227. Available at: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k98181567/f206.item.r=bloch.zoom (accessed: 25.02.2024).

Boyarin D. (2003) Sparks of the Logos: Essays in Rabbinic hermeneutics. Leiden: Brill.

Braginskaia N. V., Koval’ A. N., Shmaina-Velikanova A. I. (2014) The Books of Maccabees (Four Books of Maccabees). Rus. ed. Moscow, Mosty kul’tury Publ.; Gesharim Publ. (In Russian)

Bray G. (1996) Biblical interpretation, then and now. Downers Grove, Intervarsity Press.

Daube D. (1949) “Rabbinic methods of interpretation and Hellenistic rhetoric”, in Hebrew Union College Annual, vol. 22, pp. 239–264.

Edersheim A. (1900) The life and times of Jesus the Messiah. Rus. ed. Moscow, Tipografiia Lissnera i Geshelia Publ. (In Russian)

Ellis E. E. (1990) “Biblical Interpretation in the New Testament”, in Mikra: Text, translation, reading and interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity. Eds M. J. Mulder, H. Sysling, pp. 691–726. Assen, Van Gorcum.

Flesher P. V. M. (1995) “The Targumim”, in Judaism in Late Antiquity. Part 1: The literary and archaeological sources. Ed. by J. Neusner, pp. 40–63. Leiden, Brill.

Friedlander G. (1916) Pirkei de-Rabbi Eliezer. London, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Available at: https://www.sefaria.org/Pirkei_DeRabbi_Eliezer.21.10?ven=Pirke_de_Rabbi_Eliezer,_trans._Rabbi_Gerald_Friedlander,_London,_1916&vhe=Pirkei_Derabi_Eliezer&lang=bi (accessed: 25.02.2024).

Ginzberg L. (2003) Legends of the Jews. In 2 vols, vol. 1. Philadelphia, Jewish Publication Society.

Grant R., Tracy D. (1988) A short history of the interpretation of the Bible. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, Fortress Press.

Greenslade S. L., ed. (1965) The Cambridge history of the Bible. The West from the Reformation to the present day. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Hays R. B. (2011) The moral vision of the New Testament: A contemporary introduction to New Testament ethics. Rus. ed. Cherkassy, Kollokvium Publ. (In Russian)

Hubner H. (1996) “New Testament interpretation of the Old Testament”, in Hebrew Bible. Old Testament. The history of its interpretation. I: From the Beginnings to the Middle Ages (Until 1300) . Part 1: Antiquity. Eds М. Saebo, С. Brekelmans, Н. Haran, pp. 332–372. Gottingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Kaizer W. C. Jr. (2008) Toward an exegetical theology: Biblical exegesis for preaching and teaching. Rus. ed. St. Petersburg, Bibliia dlia vsekh Publ. (In Russian)

Knohl I. (2008) “Cain: Son of God or Son of Satan?”, in Jewish biblical interpretation and cultural exchange: Comparative exegesis in context. Eds N. B. Dohrmann, D. Stern, pp. 37–50. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Krone K. (2012) Wissenschaft in Offentlichkeit: Die Wissenschaft des Judentums und ihre Zeitschriften. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

Lieberman S. (1950) Hellenism in Jewish Palestine. New York, Jewish Theological Seminary.

Lightfoot J. (2013) From the Talmud and Hebraica. Grand Rapids, Christian Classics Ethereal Library.

Luz U. (2007) Matthew 1–7: A commentary. Minneapolis, Fortress Press.

Machiela D. A. (2009) The Dead Sea Genesis Apocryphon: A new text and translation with introduction and special treatment of columns 13–17. Leiden, Brill.

Maher M. (1992) Targum Pseudo-Jonathan: Genesis. Transl., with introd. and notes. Collegeville, The Liturgical Press.

Meuschen J. G. (1736) Novum Testamentum ex Talmude et antiquitatibus Hebraeorum illustratum. Lipsiae, Apud haer. Joh. Frid. Braunii.

Mulder M. J., Sysling H., eds (1990) Mikra: Text, translation, reading and interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity. Assen, Van Gorcum.

Reventlow H. G. (2010) History of Biblical interpretation. In 4 vols, vol. 4: From the Enlightenment to the Twentieth Century. Transl. by L. G. Perdue. Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature.

Saebo М., Brekelmans С., Haran Н., eds (1996) Hebrew Bible. Old Testament. The history of its interpretation. I: From the beginnings to the Middle Ages (until 1300). Part 1: Antiquity. Gottingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Salzer D. M., Gafni C., Harif H., eds (2019) Wissenschaft des Judentums beyond Tradition. Jewish scholarship on the Sacred Texts of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

Schöttgen J. C. (1733) Horae Ebraicae et Talmudicae in universum Novum Testamentum. In 2 vols. Dresden, Leipzig.

Steinsaltz A. (1993) An introduction to the Talmud. Rus. ed. Moscow, Kurchatovskii institut Publ. (In Russian)

Steinsaltz A. (2013) The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition. Vol. 32. Makkot & Horayot. Hamachon Hayisraeli Le’pirsumim Talmudyim. Available at: https://www.sefaria.org/Avodah_Zarah.22b.12?ven=William_Davidson_Edition_-_English&vhe=Wikisource_Talmud_Bavli&lang=bi (accessed: 25.02.2024).

Stern D. (1985) “Literary criticism or literary homilies? Susan Handelman and the contemporary study of Midrash”, in Indiana University Press, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 96–103.

Stern D. (1998) Midrash and theory: Ancient Jewish exegesis and contemporary literary studies. Evanston, Northwestern University Press.

Stern D. (2008) “On comparative Biblical exegesis — interpretation, influence, appropriation”, in Jewish biblical interpretation and cultural exchange: Comparative exegesis in context. Eds N. B. Dohrmann, D. Stern, pp. 1–19. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Strack H. L., Billerbeck P. (1922) Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch. Band 1: Das Evangelium nach Matthäus. München, Beck.

Tantlevskij I. R. (2002) The Books of Enoch. Moscow, Mosty kul’tury Publ. (In Russian)

Vanhoozer K. J. (2007) Is there a meaning in this text? The Bible, the reader, and the morality of literary knowledge. Rus. ed. Cherkassy, Kollokvium Publ. (In Russian)

Vermes G. (1970) “Bible and Midrash: Early Old Testament exegesis”, in The Cambridge history of the Bible. In 3 vols, vol. 1: From the beginnings to Jerome. Eds P. R. Ackroyd, C. F. Evans, pp. 199–231. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Weeks N. (1988) The sufficiency of Scripture. Edinburg, Banner of Truth.

Weren W. J. C. (2014) Studies in Matthew’s Gospel: Literary design, intertextuality, and social setting. Leiden, Brill Academic Publ.

Wetstein J. J. (1752) Novum Testamentum Graecum editionis receptae cum lectionibus variantibus codicum. Amsterdam, Ex Officina Dommeriana.

Wünsche A. (1878) Neue Beiträge zur Erläuterung der Evangelien aus Talmud und Midrasch. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-24

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Biblical Studies and History of Christian Thought

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.