Humanity as a tool of the Word: The beginning of monothelite disputes and Aristotle’s interpretation in the 6th century

Authors

  • Timur A. Shchukin Sociological Institute, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 25/14, 7-ya Krasnoarmeyskaya ul., St Petersburg 190005, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7513-9873

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2024.203

Abstract

The article examines the Christology of Theodore of Tharan, one of the first Monothelite theologians, in the context of philosophical teachings relevant to this time. An analysis of the surviving fragments from Theodore’s epistles shows that his writings contain four concepts that mark him as a follower of the peripatetic philosophical tradition: the source of movement for the soul-body composite is that which is beyond it; the soul is one in the sense that the vegetable, animal and rational souls constitute a single essence and their action is one; the soul is the instrument of the Word, and the body is the instrument of the soul; it is impossible for a mover to move when the mover (the source of its movement) is stationary. It is assumed that Theodore of Tharan hardly borrowed these concepts directly from Aristotle, dealing with either peripatetic or neoplatonic interpretations of the Stagirite. It is concluded that Theodore of Tharan sympathized with a point of view close to authentic Aristotelianism in the interpretation of Alexander of Aphrodisias — this is indicated by the closeness of his views to the latter’s teaching about the active mind, about the unity of the soul, about the relationship of the movable and the moving. However, the instrumentalism of Theodore of Tharan, referring rather to the Neoplatonic in terpretation of Aristotle, indicates that there is no complete identity with the views of Alexander of Aphrodisias in his texts.

Keywords:

Theodore of Tharan, monothelitism, monoenergism, Aristotle, soul and body, Christology, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Simplicius, John Philoponus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Bausenhart G. (1992) “In allem uns gleich ausser der Sünde”: Studien zum Beitrag Maximos’ des Bekenners zur altkirchlichen Christologie: Mit einer kommentierten Übersetzung der “Disputatio cum Pyrrho”. Mainz, Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag.

Benevitch G. I. (2014) “Theological and polemical writings of the Rev. Maxim the Confessor and his polemic against Monoenergism and Monothelitism”, in Rev. Maxim the Confessor. Theological and polemical writings (Opuscula Theologica et Polemica), pp. 11–298. Holy Mount Athos; St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii Publ. (In Russian)

Benevitch G. I. (2014) “Notes”, in Rev. Maxim the Confessor. Theological and polemical writings (Opuscula Theologica et Polemica), pp. 485–676. Holy Mount Athos; St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii Publ. (In Russian)

Böhm T. (2000) “Theodoros, Bf. v. Pharan”, in Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche . Bd. 9: San bis Thomas, S. 1417. Freiburg; Basel; Rom; Wien, Herder.

Bossier F., Steel C. (1972) “Priscianus Lydus en de In de anima van Pseudo(?)-Simplicius”, in Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 761–822.

Bruns I., ed. (1887) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora. Berlin, Reimer (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca suppl. II. 1).

Bruns I., ed. (1892) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora. Berlin, Reimer (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca suppl. II. 2).

Chase M. (2009–2010) “La subsistence néoplatonicienne: De Porphyre à Théodore de Raithu”, in Chôra: Revue d’Études Anciennes et Médiévales, no. 7–8, pp. 37–52.

Chase M. (N. d.) “Neoplatonic logic in Theodore of Raithu: A preliminary study”, in Academia.edu. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/5501780/Neoplatonic_Logic_in_Theodore_of_Raithu_A_preliminary_study (accessed: 05.06.2024).

Diels H., ed. (1882) Simplicii in Aristotelis physicorum libros quattuor priores commentaria. Berlin, Reimer (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca IX).

Elert W. (1951) “Theodor von Pharan und Theodor von Raithu”, in Theologishe Literaturzeitung, Bd. 76, col. 70–76.

Elert W. (1957) Der Ausgang der altkirchlichen Christologie. Berlin, Lutherisches.

Grillmeier A., Hainthaler Th. (2002) Jesus der Christus im Glauben der Kirche. Bd. 2/3: Die Kirchen von Jerusalem und Antiochien nach 451 bis 600. Freiburg; Basel; Wien, Herder.

Hadot I. (2002) “Simplicius or Priscianus? On the author of the commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima (CAG XI): A methodological study”, in Mnemosyne, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 159–199.

Hayduck M., ed. (1882) Simplicii in libros Aristotelis de anima commentaria. Berlin, Reimer (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XI).

Hayduck M., ed. (1897) Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis de anima libros commentaria. Berlin, Reimer (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca XV).

Klein W. (2002) “Theodor von Raithu”, in Theologische Realenzyklopädie . Bd. 33: Technik — Transzendenz, Ss. 246–248. Berlin; New York, Walter de Gruyter.

Knebel S. K. (1989) In genere latent aequivocayiones: Zur Tradition der Universalienkritik aus dem Geist der Dihärese. Hildesheim, Georg Olms.

Kosman A. (1995) “What does the Maker Mind Make?”, in Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Eds M. Nussbaum, A. O. Rorty, pp. 343–358. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Kreuzer G. (1998) “Theodor von Pharan”, in Biographisch-bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon. Bd. 14: Wolfram von Eschenbach — Zuygomalas, Theodosios und Ergänzungen I, Ss. 1545–1547. Herzberg, Verlag Traugott Bautz.

Maximus Confessor (1865) “Ad Marinum Cypri presbyterum (opusc. 10)”, in Patrologiae cursus completes. Series Graeca. Ed. by J.-P. Migne, vol. 91, col. 133–137.

McKirahan R. (2014) “Introduction”, in Simplicius. On Aristotle Physics 8.6–10. Ed. by R. McKirahan, pp. 1–10. London; New Delhi; New York; Sydney, Bloomsbury.

Menn S. (2002) “Aristotle’s definition of the soul and the programme of the De anima”, in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 22, pp. 83–139.

Meyendorff J. (2000) “Imperial unity and Christian divisions”, in Meyendorff J. Church History and Eastern Christian Mysticism, pp. 13–276. Moscow, Institut DI-DIK Publ. (In Russian)

Mittelmann J. (2013) “Neoplatonic sailors and peripatetic ships: Aristotle, Alexander and Philoponus”, in Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 545–566.

Nikas A. (1981) Theodoros of Raithu. Athens, Holy Monastery of Sina Publ. (In Greek)

Riedinger R., ed. (1984) Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum. Series secunda, volumen primum: Concilium Lateranense a. 649 celebratum. Berlin, De Gruyter.

Riedinger R., ed. (1992) Acta conciliorum oecumenicorum. Series secunda, volumen secundum: Concilium universale Constantinopolitanum tertium, pars 1–2. Pars 2. Berlin, De Gruyter.

Serezhnikov V. K., Popov P. S., eds (1937) Aristotle. On the Soul. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel’stvo Publ. (In Russian)

Sharples R. W., ed. (2004) Alexander of Aphrodisias Supplement to On the Soul. London; New Delhi; New York; Sydney, Bloomsbury.

Sidorov A. I. (1991) “Theodore of Raithu and Theodore of Tharan (About one of the authors of the ‘Izbornik of Svjatoslav’ 1073)”, in Drevneishie gosudarstva na territorii SSSR: materials and research, pp. 135–167. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Theodorus (1938) “Praeparatio”, in Analecta Patristica. Ed. by F. Diekamp, pp. 185–222. Rome, Pontificum Institutum Orientalium Studiorum (Orientalia Christiana Analecta 117).

Uthemann K.-H. (1997) “Der Neuchalkedonismus als Vorbereitung des Monotheletismus. Ein Beitrag zum eigentlichen Anliegen des Neuchalkedonismus”, in Studia Patristica, vol. 29, pp. 373–413.

Varlamova M. N. (2012) “On the problem of the unity and plurality in the Aristotle’s doctrine of the soul”, in ΕΙΝΑΙ: Problemy filosofii i teologii, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 342–361. (In Russian)

Varlamova M. N. (2018) “On the distinction of soul and nature of the living body in Simplicius”, in Platonicheskie issledovaniia, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 121–136. (In Russian)

Varlamova M. N. (2020) “John Philoponus’ arguments on the animation of the embryo in his commentary on Aristotle’s On the Soul”, in Platonicheskie issledovaniia, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 157–173. (In Russian)

Wildberg C. (1999) “Impetus theory and the hermeneutics of science in Simplicius and Philoponus”, in Hyperboreus. Studia Classica. Vol. 5, fasc. 1, pp. 107–124.

Winkelmann F. (2001) Der monenergetisch-monotheletische Streit. Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; Bern; Bruxelles; New York; Oxford, Lang.

Wolff M. (1978) Geschichte der Impetustheorie. Untersuchungen zum Ursprung der klassischen Mechanik. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.

Wolff M. (1987) “Philoponus and the rise of preclassical dynamics”, in Philoponus and the rejection of Aristotelian science. Ed. by R. Sorabji, pp. 84–120. Ithaca; New York, Cornwell University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-19

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Research

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.