On the interpretation of Qoh 3:10–11

Authors

  • Igor R. Tantlevskij St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.101

Abstract

The article deals with some possible variants of translation and analysis of one of the most difficult passages in point of interpretation of the Book of Qoheleth (Ecclesiastes) — Qoh 3:10–11. The author tries to show that this passage holds the key to revealing the deep essence of the whole theological-anthropological concept of this biblical work, as well as the principles of its epistemology and cognitive methodology. Particular attention is paid to identifying possible options for the interpretation of the notions hā-ʻōlām и lēḇ in Qoh 3:10–11. According to the author, the first term can be interpreted in Qoh 3:10–11 as “the Universe eternity” or “duration” (in Bergson’s understanding of this notion as applied to human consciousness and the Universe), and the second — as “mind” or “consciousness”. The author analyzes possible interpretations of the phrase mib-bǝlî ʼăšer lōʼ in Qoh 3:11bα (found nowhere else in the Bible), which is of fundamental importance for the understanding of epistemic concept of Qoheleth. The author of the article believes that the passage of Qoh 3:10–11 could be interpreted very optimistic in connection with the possibilities of human cognition: for the rational spirit of the righteous and the sage — it is the everlasting process of cognition of the universe, cognition carried out by them as if from the perspective of eternity.

Keywords:

Bible, Book of Qoheleth, hā-ʻōlām in the Bible, Qoheleth’s theology, Qoheleth’s anthropology, Qoheleth’s epistemology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


Sources

Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia. Editio quarta emendatа. Stuttgart, Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1997.

Biblia Hebraica Quinta. Megilloth: Ruth, Canticles, Qoheleth, Lamentations, Esther. Stuttgart, Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2004.

BibleWorks 10. Software for Biblical Exegesis and Research. Norfolk, VA, 2015.

“Qoheleth”, in Ulrich E. et al. (eds) Discoveries in the Judaean Desert XVI. Qumran Cave 4. XI. Psalms to Chronicles. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2000 [repr.: 2007].


References

Abegg M., Jr., Flint P., Ulrich E. (1999) The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible: The Oldest Known Bible Translated for the First Time into English. New York, NY, HarperCollins Publishers.

Averintsev S. S. (2004) “The Order of Cosmos and the Order of History”, in Averintsev S. S. Poetika rannevizantiiskoi literatury. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika Publ., pp. 89–114. (In Russian)

Bartholomew C. (2009) Ecclesiastes. Ada, MI, Baker Academic Press (repr.: 2014).

Bergson H. (1908) L’Évolution créatrice. Paris, Félix Alcan.

Brin G. (2001) The Concept of Time in the Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Leiden; Boston; Cologne, Brill.

Christianson E. S. (1998) A Time to Tell: Narrative Strategies in Ecclesiastes. Sheffield Academic Press.

Clines J. A. (ed.) (2011) The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew. Vol. VI. Sheffield, Sheffield Phoenix Press, pp. 300–307.

Diakonov I. M. (1973) “The Epic of Gilgamesh (‘He who Sees the Unknown’)”, in Biblioteka vsemirnoi literatury, Vol. 1: Poeziia i proza Drevnego Vostoka, ed. by I. Braginskii. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., pp. 166–220.

Enns P. (2011) Ecclesiastes. Grand Rapids, MI, Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Evlampiev I. I. (2020) Henri Bergson: Philosophy of the Coming Epoch. St. Petersburg, RCHGA Publ. (in press). (In Russian)

Fox M. V. (2010) A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes. Eugene, OR.

Holmstedt R. D. (2009) “The Syntactic Encoding of the Collaborative Nature of Qohelet’s Experiment”, in The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures, vol. 9, no. 19, pp. 1–27.

Hude H. (1990) “Les Cours de Bergson”, in Bergson. Naissance d’une philosophie, Actes du colloque de Clermon-Ferrand 17 et 18 novembre 1989. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 23–42.

Jeremias A. (1930) Das Alte Testament im Lichte des Alten Orients. 4. Aufl. Leipzig, J. C. Hinrichs.

Krüger Th. (2004) Qoheleth: A Commentary on the Book of Qoheleth. Minneapolis, MN, Fortress Press.

Longman T. (1998) The Book of Ecclesiastes. Grand Rapids, MI, Eerdmans Publishing Company, Michigan.

Mazzinghi L. (2000) “Il mistero del tempo: sul termine ‘olam in Qo 3,11”, in Fabris R. (ed.) Initium sapientiae: Scritti in onore de Franco Festorazzi nel suo 70 compleanno. Bologna, EDB, pp. 147–161.

Rudman D. (2001) Determinism in the Book of Ecclesiastes. Sheffield, Sheffield Academic Press.

Schoors A. (1992) The Preacher Sought to Find Pleasing Words: A Study of the Language of the Qoheleth. Leuven, Peeters.

Schoors A. (2004) The Preacher Sought to Find Pleasing Words: A Study of the Language of the Qoheleth. Part II. Vocabular. Paris, Dudley, MA, Peeters.

Shifman I. Sh. (1999) “Ancient Phoenicia. Mythology and History”, in Finikiiskaia mifologia. St. Petersburg, Letnii sad Publ. (In Russian)

Seow C. L. (1997) Ecclesiastes: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible. New York, NY, Doubleday.

Schwienhorst-Schoenberger L. (2004) Kohelet. Freiburg im Breisgau, Verlag Herder.

Tantlevskij I. R. (2017) “Possible Parallels in Ecclesiastes’ and Aristotle’s Reflections Concerning the Eternity and Immortality of the Soul in Correlation with Its Intellectual and Ethical Merits”, in Schole, vol. 11, iss. 1.

Tantlevskij I. R. (2018) Essays on the Philosophy of Spinoza. St. Petersburg, RCHGA Publ. (In Russian)

Tantlevskij I. R. (2018) “The World in Man’s Soul: Aristotle’s De anima III, 8, 431b.20–24 and Ecclesiastes 3:10–11”, in Schole, vol. 12, iss. 1. (In Russian)

Tantlevskij I. R. (2018) “How to Come to the Correct Solution? To the Interpretation of the Epistemological Definition of the Method of Comparison in Aristotle (Ethica Eudemia, VII, 1245b.13–14) and Ecclesiastes 7:27”, in Schole, vol. 12, iss. 1. (In Russian)

Tantlevskij I. R. (2019) “Allegories of Life, Death and Immortality in the Book of Ecclesiastes12: 5b–7”, in Schole, vol. 13, iss. 1. (In Russian)

Tantlevskij I. R. (2019) The Book of Qoheleth. A new Russian translation accompanied by notes and essay of philosophical and religious studies character. St. Petersburg, RCHGA Publ. (In Russian)

Tantlevskij I. R. (2020) “Skepticism as an ‘Attribute’ of Qoheleth’s Dialectical Methodology”, in Vestnik RCHGA (in press). (In Russian)

Published

2020-05-06

Issue

Section

The turns of Jewish thought