Reflections of Lev Shestov on the essence of freedom in the context of theology, philosophy and modern science

Authors

  • Igor I. Evlampiev St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.109

Abstract

In his reflections on freedom, Lev Shestov considered any definition of freedom insufficient, which excludes the concept of arbitrariness, causeless action. Although he raises the source of the idea of freedom as arbitrariness (an arbitrary desire of a person violating the laws of nature) to the Jewish prophets, in reality it was taken by him from the reasoning of the hero of the novel by F. Dostoevsky, “Notes from the Underground.” The article proves that in the words of his hero, Dostoevsky objects to A. Schopenhauer in the concept of which all human actions are subject to strict causal laws, and freedom refers to the transcendental act of “choosing” one’s character, which determines the actions and remains unchanged throughout life. However, recognizing the strict regularity of all phenomena (and actions) within the world,one can see the highest human freedom in the ability to arbitrarily change the world as a whole. This is precisely what the hero of Dostoevsky, “not reconciling” with the laws of nature, has in mind, and it is precisely to this concept of freedom that Shestov comes to. The article shows that such an understanding of freedom has parallels in theology (in Kabbalah, in Sufism and in Christian Gnosticism), and also has some foundations in modern science: the quantum theory claims that the macroscopic world is the result of many acts of  observation made jointly by all people.

Keywords:

Lev Shestov, F. Dostoevsky, A. Schopenhauer, freedom as arbitrariness, changing the past, mysticism, nothing, quantum theory

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Bergson H. (1998) Creative evolution. Moscow, Kanon-press Publ. (In Russian)

Chetverukhin A. S. (ed.) (2008) Gospel of Truth: Twelve Translations of Christian Gnostic Scriptures, transl. by D. Alekseev. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ. (In Russian)

Evlampiev I. I. (2016). “Undistorted Christianity and its primary sources”, in Solov’evskie issledovaniia, iss. 4, pp. 66–134. (In Russian)

Evlampiev I. I. (2018) “Old Testament mysticism and Greek rationalism: two ways of life in the philosophy of Leo Shestov”, in Judaica Petropolitana: nauchno-teoreticheskii zhurnal, iss. 9, pp. 65–76. (In Russian)

Lega V. P. (2009) History of Western Philosophy. Part one. Antiquity. Middle Ages. Revival: study guide, 2nd ed. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo PSTGU Publ. (In Russian)

Nietzsche F. (1990) “Human, too human”, in Nietzsche F. Sochineniia: in 2 vols. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., vol. 1, pp. 231–490. (In Russian)

Okulov A. F. (ed.) (1989) Apocrypha of ancient Christians: research, texts, comments. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Schopenhauer A. (2001) “About free will”, in Schopenhauer A. Sochineniia: in 6 vols. Moscow, TERRA Publ., vol. 3, pp. 303–374. (In Russian)

Shestov L. (2002) “The Speculation and the Apocalypse. Religious philosophy of Vl. Solovyov’, in Vl. Solov’ev: Pro et contra, vol. 2. St. Petersburg, RKHGA Publ., pp. 467–530. (In Russian)

Shestov L. (1993) “On the scales of Job (Wandering on souls)”, in Shestov L. Sochineniia: in 2 vols. Moscow, Nauka Publ., vol. 2, pp. 5–402. (In Russian)

Shestov L. (1993) “Potestas clavium (The power of the keys)”, in Shestov L. Sochineniia: in 2 vols. Moscow, Nauka Publ., vol. 1, pp. 17–312. (In Russian)

Wheeler J. (1982) “Quantum and the Universe”, in Astrofizika, kvanty i teoriia otnositel’nosti, ed. by F. I. Fedorov. Moscow, Mir Publ., pp. 536–558. (In Russian)

Published

2020-05-06

Issue

Section

Research