Ways of post-metaphysical thinking about God

Authors

  • Svetlana A. Konacheva Russian State University for the Humanities, 6, Miusskaya pl., Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation
  • Alexander I. Kyrlezhev The Synodal Biblical and Theological Commission of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Commission on Theology and Theological Education of the Inter-Council Presence, Saints Cyril and Methodius Institute for Postgraduate Studies, 4/2, Pyatnitskaya ul., Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.111

Abstract

In the conversation, various strategies of theological thought of the second half of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries are considered, which are characterized by a repulsion of the old metaphysical concept of God as, above all, a higher being. Against the background of criticism of such onto-theological theology undertaken by Martin Heidegger, various theological directions arise and develop, within the framework of which the boundary between philosophy and theology, established by default in the Modernity, is blurred. In the monograph of Svetlana Konacheva, the discussion of which is devoted to the conversation, the Russianspeaking reader encounters the positions of such authors as Eberhardt Jungel, Bernhard Welte, Wilhelm Weishedel, Heinrich Ott, John Caputo, Richard Kearney, as well as modern Orthodox philosophers and theologians David Bentley Hart and John Panteleimon Manussakis. The post-metaphysical thinking that these authors demonstrate is considered in connection with traditional Christian dogmatics. It touches on issues related to the phenomenological and hermeneutic approaches, as well as topics of religious language and the significance of deconstruction for theological thought. The influence of not only Heidegger, but also Hegel, as well as Jacques Derrida, is discussed. The conversation introduces into the problem areas of modern theological thought that are not well-known to the domestic reader.

Keywords:

philosophy, theology, phenomenology, hermeneutics, post-metaphysical thinking, religious language, Heidegger, impossible, weak theology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

“About the Gift: a discussion between Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Marion” (2011), in Logos, no. 3, pp. 144–171. (In Russian)

Altizer Th. (2010) Death of God. The Gospel of Christian Atheism. Russ. ed. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ.

Barth K. (1960) “Philosophie und Theologie”, in Huber G. (Hrsg.) Philosophie und christliche Existenz. Festschrift für Heinrich Barth zum 70. Geburtstag am 3. Februar 1960. Basel, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, S. 93–106.

Caputo J. (1997) The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion without Religion. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

Caputo J. D. (1987) Demythologizing Heidegger. Bloomington; Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.

Heidegger M. (1970) “Phänomenologie und Theologie”, in Phänomenologie und Theologie. Frankfurt a. M., S. 13–33.

Heidegger M. (1989) Beiträge zur Philosophie. (Vom Ereignis) (1936–1939) (Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 65). Frankfurt a. M., Klostermann.

Heidegger M. (1991) The Language, transl. and comments by B. V. Markov. Russ. ed. St. Petersburg, Intellect Publ. (In Russian)

Heidegger M. (1995) “Die philosophischen Grundlagen der mittelalterlichen Mystik”, in Heidegger M. Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens (Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 60). Frankfurt a. M., Klostermann, S. 303–339.

Heidegger M. (2006) “Die Onto-theo-logische Verfassung der Metaphysik”, in Heidegger M. Identität und Differenz. (Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 11). Frankfurt a. M., Klostermann, S. 51–80.

Iannaras Chr. (2005) “Heidegger and the Areopagite, or on the absence and unknowability of God”, transl. from Greek by G. V. Vdovina, in Iannaras Chr. Izbrannoe: Lichnost’ i Eros. Russ. ed. Moscow, Rosspen Publ., pp. 7–88. (In Russian)

Jenson R. W. (1997) Systematic Theology. Vol. 1: The Triune God. New York.

Kearney R. (1984) The God who may be: a hermeneutic of religion. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

Kearney R. (2006) “Epiphanies of the Everyday: Toward a Micro-Eschatology”, in Manoussakis J. P. (ed.) After God: Richard Kearney and the religious turn in continental philosophy. New York, Fordham University Press, pp. 3–22.

Konacheva S. A. (2019) God after God: ways of post-metaphysical thinking. Moscow, RGGU Publ. (In Russian)

Kyung G. (2012) Christian challenge. Russ. ed. Moscow, BBI Publ. (In Russian)

Kyung G. (2013) Freud and future religion. Russ. ed. Moscow, BBI Publ. (In Russian)

Kyung G. (2014) Eternal life? Russ. ed. Moscow, BBI Publ. (In Russian)

Manussakis Dzh. P. (2014) God after metaphysics. Theological Aesthetics. Kiev, DUKh I LITERA Publ. (In Russian)

Moltmann Yu. (2013) Man. Russ. ed. Moscow, BBI Publ. (In Russian)

Moltmann Yu. (2017) Christian eschatology. Russ. ed. Moscow, BBI Publ. (In Russian)

Moltmann Yu. (2017) Spiritual life. Holistic pneumatology. Russ. ed. Moscow, BBI Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2020-05-06

Issue

Section

Conversations