Christian tradition and the problem of procreation in the “Structure of theological revolutions” Mark Massa

Authors

  • Dmitry A. Markov St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University, 6, Likhov per., Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.204

Abstract

This article is devoted to the analysis of the theses described by M. Massa in his book “The structure of theological revolutions”. This book This book is an introduction to the problems of the essence of Christian Tradition, natural law and moral theology, the theology of marriage and its particular aspect related to childbearing. The article analyzes the main thesis of M. Massa on the example of reception by American Catholics of the provisions of the encyclical “Humanae vitae”. The thesis is that in Catholicism there is no single tradition of theology that evolves in the way T. Kuhn wrote about this in relation to science. For introduction into the context of the described M. Mass reception of the encyclical “Himanae vitae” the article describes the history of its occurrence. “Humanae vitae” is compared with papal encyclicals containing conflicting ideas to the main thesis of this text. By the example of several authors, to whom individual paragraphs in the “Structure…” by M. Mass are devoted, this contradiction between the birth of children and their upbringing is described. In the final part of the article, several conclusions are made: M. Massa, adapts T. Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions to theology, but does not take into account the specifics of this field of knowledge; the author speaks of the absence of a unified Catholic tradition of theology; since there is a position about paradigms changing in theology that are sensitive to the problems of our time, any anti-church action could find support in church theology. A set of these conclusions allowed the author of the article to conclude with an assumption about what the tradition of Orthodox theology should be, so that it is sensitive to the problems of modernity and at the same time does not lose its identity.

Keywords:

theology, moral theology, American Catholicism, Christian tradition, natural law, marriage, family, childbearing, birth control

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Antonov K. M. (2012) “Theology as a scientific specialty”, in Philosophy issues, no. 6, pp. 73–84. (In Russian)

Babenko V. T. (2001) “Golden ten”, in Nauka i zhizn’, no. 11, pp. 2–7. (In Russian)

Davydov O. B. (2017) “‘New theology’ in the context of the evolution of Catholic thought”, in Сhristian reading, no. 6, pp. 39–50. (In Russian)

Chretien С. (2019) “Lesbian Episcopal ‘priest’ named new head of National Abortion Federation”, in Life Site, Nov 5. Available at: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lesbian-episcopal-priest-named-new-head-of-national-abortion-federation (accessed: 19.11.2019).

Emel’ianov N., sviashch. (2012) “Theory of dogmatic development”, in Orthodox encyclopedia, Vol. 15. Moscow, Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia Publ., pp. 534–542. (In Russian)

Eroshev E. V. (2020) “Rhetoric of the crisis of religion in German theology of the priesthood based on the works of Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger)”, in Materials of the IV International Scientific Conference “Church Science at the Beginning of the Third Millennium: Actual Problems and Development Prospects” . Minsk, Izdatel’stvo Minskoi dukhovnoi akademii Publ., pp. 20–26. (In Russian)

Kalinichenko E. V., Ponomarev V. P., Potashinskaia N. N., Puchkin D. E., Tiushagin V. V. (2004) “Second Vatican Council”, in Orthodox encyclopedia, vol. 7. Moscow, Pravoslavnaia entsiklopediia Publ., pp. 268–303. (In Russian)

Kapitsa S. P. (1999) How many people lived, lives and will live on Earth. Moscow, Nauka. Publ. (In Russian)

Kun T. (1977) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Moscow, Progress Publ. (In Russian)

Lonergan B. (2010) Method in theology. Moscow, Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sviatogo Fomy Publ. (In Russian)

Lutsenko T. V. (2012) “The evolution of the theological views of Luther in the context of modernity”, in Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Ser. Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Pravo, no. 14(133), pp. 202–208. (In Russian)

Mal’tus T. (1993) “Experience on Population Law”, in Masterpieces of the highest economic thought, in 4 vols, vol. 4. Petrozavodsk, Petrokom Publ. (In Russian)

Massa M. S. (2010) The American Catholic Revolution: How the Sixties Changed the Church Forever. New York, Oxford University Press.

Massa M. S. (2018) The Structure of Theological Revolutions: How the Fight Over Birth Control Transformed American Catholicism. New York, Oxford University Press.

Mikhailov P. B (2011) “Beginnings of theological knowledge”, in Bulletin of St. Tikhon’s University. Series I: Theology. Philosophy, iss. 3 (35), pp. 7–21. (In Russian)

Papa Pavel VI. Humanae vitae. Available at: http://www.unavoce.ru/library/humanae_vitae.html (accessed: 17.01.2020). (In Russian)

Pol’skov K. O (2010) “To the Question of the Scientific Theological Method”, in Philosophy issues, no. 7, pp. 93–101. (In Russian)

Quigley W. P. (2006) “The Living Wage and Catholic Social Teaching”, in America Magazine, August 28. Available at: https://www.americamagazine.org/issue/581/article/living-wageand-catholic-social-teaching (accessed: 19.11.2019). (In Russian)

Sukhova N. Iu. (2007) Spiritual vineyard of sciences: A collection of articles on the stories of higher spiritual education. Moscow, Izd-vo Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tihonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2020-07-19

Issue

Section

Research