Church court in Russia: The view of a lawyer

Authors

  • Yulia V. Erokhina National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, 20, Myasnitskaya ul., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2020.209

Abstract

In the article, the author attempts to consider the church court through the prism of a theoretical analysis of some aporias of the church court and their implementation in practice. As a rule, aporias arise based on the fact that contradictions are inherent in the object itself or its perception. The author analyzes the aporia of the church court, fictitious, logically correct statements and judgments about the nature and activities of the church court, which cannot be put into practice without resolving the contradictions. The first aporia: the basis of the judicial activity of the church should be unchanged. The second aporia: the activity of the church court should be considered outside the state system of secular law. An appeal in the article to pre-revolutionary church and secular law will help to partially reveal the principles of church proceedings and structure, and to reveal contradictions in the understanding of modern church court. Depending on the relationship between the church and the state, their interaction, the model of the church court is transformed: the church court is part of the state judicial system or the church court is not part of the state judicial system. The author concludes that the indicated aporia of a church court are logically correct judgments. Aporias reveal contradictions in views on church court from the part of church and secular law. Many contradictions and intractable issues were identified during the state judicial reform by Emperor Alexander II, but they were not taken into account in modern times when creating a modern church court. The Statute of the Church Court contains legal categories of secular law. The Russian Orthodox Church is faced with the task of resolving the contradictions associated with the nature and activity of the church court. An explanation is provided why the considered aporia of the church court cannot yet be practically realized.

Keywords:

Russian Orthodox Church, The Statute of the Church, church court, law, church law, canon law, aporia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Adel’geim, P. protoierej (2013) To the discussion of Church proceedings. Part 1. Legitimacy of judges of the Pskov Diocesan court. Available at: https://psmb.ru/a/blog-svyashchennika-pavla-adelgeyma-o-cerkovnom-sude.html (accessed: 06.12.2019). (In Russian)

Barsov T. V. (1870) “On the spiritual court”, in Khristianskoe chtenieм, no. 9, pp. 462–510. (In Russian)

Beliakova E. (2004) “Church Court in Civil Society”, in Russkii zhurnal, 10.11.2004. Available at: http://russ.ru/pole/Cerkovnyj-sud-v-grazhdanskom-obschestve/ (accessed: 20.12.2019). (In Russian)

Bol’shakova O. V. (2000) “Judicial reform of 1864 and the formation of legal culture in pre-revolutionary Russia (review of English literature)”, in Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaia i zarubezhnaia literatura. Ser. 5: Istoriia, no. 1, pp. 9–10. (In Russian)

Bulgakov S., protorierei (1991) “Christian sociology”, in Vestnik Russkogo khristianskogo dvizheniia, no. 161, pp. 5–59. (In Russian)

Derrida J. (1990) “The Force of Law. The Mystical Foundation of Authority”, in Cardozo Law Review, vol. 11, no. 5–6, pp. 919–1045.

Dorskaya A. A. (2009) “The legal heritage of Nikolai Semenovich Suvorov”, in Istoriia gosudarstva i prava, no. 13, pp. 17–20. (In Russian)

Dorskaya A. A. (2010) “The evolution of the place of canonical (church) law in the system of Russian law”, in Iurisprudentsiia, no. 2, pp. 37–43. (In Russian)

Fomina M. N. (2008) “Political and legal aspects of the ‘Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church’”, in Izvestiia Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Politologiia. Religiovedenie, no. 1, pp. 283–293. (In Russian)

Gaidenko P. I. (2019) “The failed reform of Church courts in Russia at the end of the 19th century in the understanding of St. Petersburg scientists (review of the article by D. V. Voluzhkov ‘Professor of the St. Petersburg theological Academy T. V. Barsov on the reform of the spiritual court of the Russian Church (based on articles in the journal ‘Christian reading’ 1870–1873)’”, in Khristianskoe chtenie, no. 5, pp. 119–128. (In Russian)

Habermas Yu. (1992) “Modern is an unfinished project”, in Voprosy filosofii, no. 4, pp. 40–51. (In Russian)

Husserl E. (2004) “The main problems of phenomenology”, in Raseev D. N. In the networks of phenomenology, transl. from Greman A. A. Anipko. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Publ. (In Russian)

Konstantinov I., ierei. (2011) “Pragmatic assessment of church legislative acts of the Russian Orthodox Church in the aspect of unification and codification (on the example of church law-making in 1945–1990)”, in Bogoslov.ru. 26.04.2011. Available at: http://www.bogoslov.ru/text/1632261.html (accessed: 28.12.2019). (In Russian)

Lebedeva G. E., Morozov M. A. (1998) “At the origins of the study of canon law in Russia: A. S. Pavlov, History of Byzantium and Byzantine archeology”, in Istoriia Vizantii i vizantiiskaia arkheologiia. Tezisy dokladov X nauchnykh Siuziumovskikh chtenii. 25–27 marta 1998 g. Ekaterinburg, UrGU Publ. (In Russian)

Ospennikov Yu. V. (2018) “On approaches to the interpretation of fictions in secular and ecclesiastical law, On the article by hieromonk Mark (Svyatogorov) and N. A. Tarnakin ‘Legal fictions and presumptions in church legal proceedings’”, in Khristianskoe chtenie, no. 2, pp. 92–96. (In Russian)

Ozerkis A. P. (2008) “The new concept of justice in the second half of the 19th century”, in Istoriia gosudarstva i prava, no. 7, pp. 37–38. (In Russian)

Palibin N. N. (1900) The charter of the spiritual consistories: with additions and clarifications of the Holy Synod and the Governing Senate, ed. by M. N. Palibin. St. Petersburg, Tip. M. Merkusheva Publ. (In Russian)

Pavlov A. S. (1902) The course of ecclesiastical law. Sergiev Posad, Tipografiia Sviato-Troitskoi Sergievoi Lavry Publ. (In Russian)

Pavlushkov A. R. (2016) “Attempts to reform Church legal proceedings in the 2nd half of the 19th century as a new vision of the legal status of the Russian Orthodox Church”, in Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriia Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, no. 1, pp. 47–57. (In Russian)

Petrov V. V. (2007) Maxim the Confessor: ontology and method in Byzantine philosophy of the 7th century. Moscow, IFRAN Publ. (In Russian)

Prolygina I. (transl.) (2003) “Aporia of Maximus the Confessor”, in Al’fa i Omega, no. 38, pp. 38–46. (In Russian)

Shlyapin A., sviashchennik. Tradition of the Universal Church. Report at the Pastoral Seminar of the Mozhaisk Deanery 03.10.2017. Available at: http://ieralexei.ortox.ru/bogoslovie/view/id/1199689 (accessed: 10.01.2020). (In Russian)

Smolich I. K. (1997) History of the Russian church, in 2 vols. Moscow, Valaamskii monastyr’ Publ. (In Russian)

Smykalin A. S. (2015) “Historical and comparative analysis of the modern judicial system of the Russian Federation and the Church courts of the Russian Orthodox Church”, in Biznes, menedzhment i pravo, no. 2, pp. 154–160. (In Russian)

Sokolov N. K. (1870) “On the principles and forms of spiritual judgment in view of modern needs”, in Pravoslavnoe obozrenie, May, pp. 825–826. (In Russian)

Suvorov N. S. (1889) The course of ecclesiastical law, in 2 vols, vol. 1. Yaroslavl, Tipo-lit. G. Fal’k Publ. (In Russian)

Syrykh V. M. (2000) The logical foundations of the general theory of law: in 2 vols. Vol. 1: Elemental composition. Moscow, Iustitsinform Publ. (In Russian)

Tolkachenko A. (2002) “T. Malakhovich v. South Sakhalin Diocese”, in Rossiiskaia iustitsiia, no. 5, pp. 51–53. (In Russian)

Tsypin V., protoierei (1994) Church law: a course of lectures. Moscow, Kruglyi stol po religioznomu obrazovaniiu v Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi Publ.

Tsypin V., protoierei (2008) Draft “Regulations on the Church court” . Available at: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/420396.html/ (accessed: 06.12.2019). (In Russian)

Tsypin V., protoierei (2009) Canon law. Moscow, Izd-vo Sretenskogo monastyria Publ. (In Russian)

Voluzhkov D. V. (2019) “Professor of the St. Petersburg theological Academy T. V. Barsov on the reform of the spiritual court of the Russian Church (based on articles in the journal ‘Christian Reading’ 1870–1873)”, in Khristianskoe chtenie, no. 1, pp. 119–130. (In Russian)

Zaozerskii N. (1894) About church authority. Sergiev Posad, tip. A. I. Snegirevoi Publ. (In Russian)

Znamenskii P. V. (1873) Parish clergy in Russia since Peter’s reform. Kazan’, Universitetskaia tipografiia Publ. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2020-07-19

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Research

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.