What does God know? Treatise on the “divine knowledge” in the structure of natural theology by Francisco Suárez

Authors

  • Vitaly L. Ivanov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2022.305

Abstract

The article is a study of the late scholastic concept of natural theology based on the works of Fr. Suárez, Metaphysical Disputations (1597) and De Deo Uno et Trino (1607), as well as the analysis of the treatise on “divine knowledge” and the demonstration of its significance in the structure of Suárez’s natural theology. First, the article explicates the concept of natural theology as the highest and most noble part of metaphysical science, since the natural theology of Suárez differs both from supernatural or revelation theology, and from the whole metaphysical knowledge about being. Second, the thematic content of natural theology is described in comparison with revelation theology, and the general method of natural theology, which is determined by the specific limitations of the natural knowledge of God in this life, is analyzed. At the same time, the most important role of the traditional scholastic concept of “perfectio simpliciter” as revealing the essence of Suárez’s method in natural theology is emphasized. Third, we point out the reasons for the special significance of the treatise on the “divine knowledge/scientia Dei” contained in section 15 of Suárez’s 30th Metaphysical disputation, and analyze the structure of this treatise, showing how Suárez’s exposition in it corresponds to the general “rule of method”. Fourth, the article thematizes the question of the objects of knowledge of the divine intellect, explains the general division of objects into three classes and explicates the complex type of connection between the cognition of the primary and secondary objects of the divine intellect, since it determines the way God knows finite possible things “in themselves”. Finally, we show a certain ambivalence in Suárez’s understanding of the reality and objectivity of the objective being (esse obiectivum) of possible finite essences as a secondary object that terminates divine knowledge.

Keywords:

natural theology of Francisco Suárez, revelation theology, the method of theology, treatise on the divine knowledge, the objects of divine knowledge, esse obiectivum and esse reale

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Aertsen J. (2012) Medieval philosophy as transcendental thought. From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez. Leiden; Boston, Brill.

Courtine J.-F. (1990) Suarez et le système de la métaphysique. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

Doyle J. P. (1967) “Suárez on the Reality of the Possibles”, in The Modern Schoolman, vol. 45 (1), pp. 29–49.

Doyle J. P. (2010) “Suárez on the Reality of the Possibles”, in Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez, SJ (1548–1617). Ed. by V. M. Salas, pp. 21–40. Leuven, Leuven University Press.

Doyle J. P. (2010) “The Suarezian Proof for God’s Existence”, in Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez, SJ (1548–1617). Ed. by V. M. Salas, pp. 109–122. Leuven, Leuven University Press.

Duns Scotus OFM (2015) “Ordinatio I, dist. 43, q. un.; and fragments from: Ordinatio I, dist. 36, q. un.; Ordinatio II, dist. 1, q. 2; Reportatio I-A, dist. 43, q. 1”. Translation from Latin into Russian with commentary by V. L. Ivanov, in Mnogolikaia sofistika: nelegitimnaia argumentatsiia v intellektual’noi kul’ture Evropy Srednikh vekov i rannego Novogo vremeni. Ed. by P. V. Sokolov, pp. 26–57. Moscow, HSE Publishing House. (In Russian)

Forlivesi M. (2008) “‘Quae in hac quaestione tradit Doctor videntur humanum ingenium superare’. Scotus, Andrés, Bonet, Zerbi and Trombetta Confronting the Nature of Metaphysics”, in Quaestio, vol. 8: La posterità di Giovanni Duns Scoto. Eds P. Porro, J. Schmutz, pp. 219–277.

Franciscus de Marchia OFM (2012) Quaestiones super metaphysicam. Critice ed. a Nazareno Mariani OFM. Grottaferrata (Roma), ed. Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.

Goudriaan A. (1999) Philosophische Gotteserkenntnis bei Suárez und Descartes im Zusammenhang mit der niederländischen reformierten Theologie und Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Leiden; Boston, Brill.

Heider D. (2009) “The Nature of Suárez’s Metaphysics. Disputationes Metaphysicae and their main systematic strains”, in Studia Neoaristotelica, vol. 6 (1), pp. 99–109.

Honnefelder L. (1990) Scientia transcendens. Die formale Bestimmung der Seiendheit in der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit (Duns Scotus — Suárez — Wolff — Kant — Peirce). Hamburg, Felix Meiner Verlag.

Ivanov V. L. (2012) “The Philosophy of the Jesuits as the Lost Key Element in the scientific landscape of the 17th century: On the Insufficiency of traditional image of the history of philosophy and sciences in the Early Modern time”, in Philosophy of history of philosophy: The obligatoriness and importunity of historical. Ed. by E. V. Malyshkin, pp. 120–142. St Petersburg, St Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

Ivanov V. L. (2015) “‘ens, hoc est, cui non repugnat esse’: The Doctrine of John Duns Scotus on the possible being and contradictory ‘nothing’ in the context of theological explication of the essence of creature as the object of divine scientia and omnipotentia”, in Mnogolikaia sofistika: nelegitimnaia argumentatsiia v intellektual’noi kul’ture Evropy Srednikh vekov I rannego Novogo vremeni. Ed. by P. V. Sokolov, pp. 17–26. Moscow, HSE Publishing House. (In Russian)

Ivanov V. L. (2021) “The formation of the ontological concept of ‘status of things’ in the 16th — first half of the 17th centuries Jesuit metaphysics and theology”, in ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, vol. 15 (2), pp. 716–744. (In Russian)

Ivanov V. L. (2022) “Objective, transcendental, formal truth: The question on truth in the early modern Jesuit metaphysics and scholastic theology”, in ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, vol. 16 (2), pp. 592–633. (In Russian)

Ivanov V. L. (2022) “The ontological constitution of res as ‘simul totum’ and the doctrine of distinctions in Metaphysica of Nicholas Bonetus”, in Philosophy Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 50–69. (In Russian)

Knebel S. K. (2000) Wille, Würfel und Wahrscheinlichkeit: Das System der moralischen Notwendigkeit in der Jesuitenscholastik 1550–1700. Hamburg, Felix Meiner Verlag.

Knebel S. K. (2007) “Gratia efficax: Kausalität und Gnadenwirksamkeit im Suarezismus. Einleitung zu: Diego del Mármol SJ. (1590–1664). Tractatus De Auxilio efficaci divinae Gratiae, ac eius cum libero arbitrio creato concordia”. Hrsg. v. Sven K. Knebel, in Die scholastische Theologie im Zeitalter der Gnadenstreitigkeiten I: Neue Texte von Diego Paez († 1582), Diego del Mármol († 1664) und Gregor von Valencia († 1603). Hrsg. v. Ulrich L. Lehner, S. 9–54. Nordhausen, Verlag Traugott Bautz.

Knebel S. K. (2011) Suarezismus. Erkenntnistheoretisches aus dem Nachlass des Jesuitengenerals Tirso González de Santalla (1624–1705). Abhandlung und Edition. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, B. R. Grüner.

Knebel S. K. (2021) Scientia Media. Der Molinismus und das Faktenwissen. Mit einer Edition des Ms. BU Salamanca 156 von 1653. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, J. Benjamins.

Mandrella I. (2008) “Metaphysik als Supertranszendentalwissenschaft? Zum scotistischen Metaphysikentwurf des Nicolaus Bonetus”, in Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales, Bd. 75, S. 161–193.

Marschler Th. (2007) Die spekulative Trinitätslehre des Francisco Suárez S. J. in ihrem philosophisch-theologischen Kontext. Münster, Aschendorff Verlag.

Martinez de Ripalda I. SJ (1634) De ente supernaturali Disputationes in universam theologiam. Tomus prior. Burdigalae, Apud Guillelmum Millangium Typographum Regium.

Raynaud Th. SJ (1622) Theologia naturalis, sive entis increati et creati, intra supremam abstractionem, ex naturae lumine investigatio. Lugduni, Sumpt. Cl. Landet.

Schabel C. D. (2011) “Reshaping the genre: Literary trends in philosophical theology in the fourteenth century”, in Crossing Boundaries at Medieval Universities. Ed. by S. E. Young. Leiden; Boston, Brill. P. 51–84.

Schmutz J. (2003) La querelle des possibles. Recherches philosophiques et textuelles sur la métaphysique jésuite espagnole, 1540–1767 (Thèse de Doctorat. Ecole pratique des hautes etudes, Paris; Université libre de Bruxelles). T. I–II.

Smith G. R. (2021) “The Natural Theology of Nicholas Bonetus”. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, no. 4, pp. 642–667.

Suárez SJ (1597) Metaphysicarum disputationum, in quibus et universa naturalis theologia ordinate traditur, & quaestiones omnes ad duodecim Aristotelis libros pertinentes accuratè disputantur. Tomus Prior et Posterior. Autore R. P. Francisco Suarez è Societate JESU. Salmanticae, Apud Ioannem et Andream Renaut, fratres.

Suárez SJ (1607) Doctoris Fran. Suares e Societate Iesu, Prima pars Summae Theologiae de Deo Uno et Trino. Lugduni, Sumptibus Horatii Cardon.

Suárez SJ (2022) “Disputationes Metaphysicae. Disputation XXVIII”. Translated into Russian by G. V. Vdovina, in Issues of Theology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 10–53. (In Russian)

Vdovina G. V. (2017) “Arguments for the existence of God in Francisco Suarez’ Metaphysical Disputations”, in St Tikhon’s University Review. Ser. 1. Theology. Philosophy. Religious studies, vol. 73, pp. 69–82. (In Russian)

Vdovina G. V. (2020) Chimeras in the Forests of Scholasticism. Ens rationis and Objective Being. St Petersburg, St Petersburg Theological Academy Publishing House, Herzen RSPU Publishing House. (In Russian)

Vdovina G. V. (2022) “On the foundation of the philosophical theology of Francisco Suarez: Disputation XXVIII of Disputationes Metaphysicae”, in Issues of Theology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 6–9. (In Russian)

Wells N. J. (1981) “Suarez on the Eternal Truths: Part I”, in The Modern Schoolman, vol. 58 (1), pp. 73–104.

Wells N. J. (1981) “Suarez on the Eternal Truths: Part II”, in The Modern Schoolman, vol. 58 (2), pp. 159–174.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-22

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022)

Section

History of Christian Thought

License

Articles of "Issues of Theology" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.